Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Huckabee Wanted to Isolate AIDS Patients
Associated Press via Yahoo News ^ | December 8, 2007 | ANDREW DeMILLO

Posted on 12/10/2007 1:59:41 AM PST by america4vr

Mike Huckabee once advocated isolating AIDS patients from the general public, opposed increased federal funding in the search for a cure and said homosexuality could "pose a dangerous public health risk."

As a candidate for a U.S. Senate seat in 1992, Huckabee answered 229 questions submitted to him by The Associated Press. Besides a quarantine, Huckabee suggested that Hollywood celebrities fund AIDS research from their own pockets, rather than federal health agencies.

Huckabee said Saturday that his comments came at a time when the public was still learning about HIV and AIDS and promised to do "everything possible to transform the promise of a vaccine and a cure into reality."

In 1992, Huckabee wrote, "If the federal government is truly serious about doing something with the AIDS virus, we need to take steps that would isolate the carriers of this plague."

"It is difficult to understand the public policy towards AIDS. It is the first time in the history of civilization in which the carriers of a genuine plague have not been isolated from the general population, and in which this deadly disease for which there is no cure is being treated as a civil rights issue instead of the true health crisis it represents."

The AP submitted the questionnaire to both candidates in the 1992 senate race; only Huckabee responded. Incumbent Sen. Dale Bumpers won his fourth term; Huckabee was elected lieutenant governor the next year and became governor in 1996.

When asked about AIDS research in 1992, Huckabee complained that AIDS research received an unfair share of federal dollars when compared to cancer, diabetes and heart disease.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: aids; gay; publicsafety
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: america4vr

If you are a doctor or millionaire or maybe and engineer you may or may not be allowed to live and work in the U.S.
BUT if you have aids and come here and say you are persecuted in whatever craphole you came from you are encouraged to stay in the U.S. for the remainder of your life.
Just because you have aids.
GREAT.


21 posted on 12/10/2007 3:15:25 AM PST by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

Yes, news reporters report this as if it were a bad thing.
I am a nurse, and I left my job because I worked with aids patients. My husband did not want an infected wife. I would prefer a world where aids is not such a risk for everyone.


22 posted on 12/10/2007 3:20:19 AM PST by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: america4vr
"When asked about AIDS research in 1992, Huckabee complained that AIDS research received an unfair share of federal dollars when compared to cancer, diabetes and heart disease." Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
23 posted on 12/10/2007 3:22:01 AM PST by Roccus (Hillary........brought to you by the PRC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush
Blood transfusions victims & innocent babies deserve Beverly Hills medical treatment.

Paid for with a tax on homosexuals.

24 posted on 12/10/2007 3:50:35 AM PST by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC
At least Huck brought a sense of hope that there may be a conservative candidate with some positive electoral upside. Is it my imagination, it appears like everyone is running backwards? As soon as anyone gets any positive public traction they are quickly slammed down. I am not sure that this pattern serves anyone's purpose. It is not good if the nominee is merely the last man standing. The only thing that appears to unite the conservative voice is a hatred of Hillary. What happens if she is not nominated?
25 posted on 12/10/2007 3:53:36 AM PST by spatso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: america4vr

This story made me like Huckabee a lot more, at first. Then I saw he’s distancing himself from those positions, which means he’s not brave at all, but a coward, and that in the end made me like him even less than I had before.


26 posted on 12/10/2007 4:08:18 AM PST by counterpunch (Hillary'08 :: At Least She's Not Rudy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: america4vr
If the federal government is truly serious about doing something with the AIDS virus, we need to take steps that would isolate the carriers of this plague.

I guess this is a little more truth than liberals can handle.

27 posted on 12/10/2007 4:22:26 AM PST by libertylover (Liberals: Trying to convert the U.S. into a country the Founding Father's wouldn't recognize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spatso
Is it my imagination, it appears like everyone is running backwards? As soon as anyone gets any positive public traction they are quickly slammed down. I am not sure that this pattern serves anyone's purpose. It is not good if the nominee is merely the last man standing.

I think that's what Duncan Hunter is counting on.

28 posted on 12/10/2007 4:37:53 AM PST by esarlls3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: america4vr

That is still the only sane approach and might have severely limited the spread of the disease if it had been in practice from the beginning. But, alas! quarantining homosexuals is Unconstitutional.


29 posted on 12/10/2007 5:12:25 AM PST by ThanhPhero (di hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThanhPhero

On what basis do you deem it unconstitutional?


30 posted on 12/10/2007 5:27:17 AM PST by america4vr (The ebb and flow of empires have come and gone but America shall forever reign supreme.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Actually, isolating carriers of contagious disease is good public health policy. It used to be SOP for diseases like TB and cholera. AIDS is the first politically protected disease. The homosexual lobby owns the democrat party and the media. It has intimidated the Republicans. It is now so bad that we even issue visas to foreign AIDS sufferers and HIV carriers, a marked departure from the former general prohibition against issuance of visas to foreigners who might potentially endanger the health of Americans. Huckabee has a winner here, if only he has the courage to remain firm. Media elites and liberal democrats may be appalled at Huckabee’s suggestion. Most common sense thinking Americans will side with him.
31 posted on 12/10/2007 5:38:49 AM PST by Godwin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: america4vr

The current ACLU interpretation of the Constitution under which the country seems to be effectively operating. The one that sets homosexuals aside as special persons with special rights, an official Elite, as it were.


32 posted on 12/10/2007 5:43:17 AM PST by ThanhPhero (di hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Godwin1

I don’t recall hearing any objections to using isolation to control leprosy, either.


33 posted on 12/10/2007 5:44:21 AM PST by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Joann37
Especially back in 1992, when very little was known about the disease. And what was thought at the time was that it was highly contageous and deadly

Nope. That might fly for, say, 1986, but in 1992 the transmission of AIDS was understood about as well as it is now. I remember we had a presentation at school about it no later than 1990 that was generally accurate. The main difference was probably that we regarded it as lethal within ten years or so, whereas now there are treatments.

34 posted on 12/10/2007 5:46:28 AM PST by Sloth (Democrats and GOPers are to government what Jeffrey Dahmer and Michael Jackson are to babysitting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

Imagine the millions of lives that would have been saved if someone had the balls to quarantine those with AIDS when the virus was first identified. Of course, not having anonymous anal sex with multiple partners would help as well....


35 posted on 12/10/2007 5:59:49 AM PST by Maverick68 (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: america4vr

First sensible thing I’ve heard about his past positions in some time.


36 posted on 12/10/2007 6:01:50 AM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThanhPhero
Well then, I must strenuously disagree that isolating them is unconstitutional.

No one can claim they are being isolated based on their sexuality proclivity. it was a matter of a definitive marker in their blood that would have determined whether or not they were to be segregated, if/when it would have come to that.

Homosexuals who didn't prove positive, would NOT have been isolated, I'm very confident to say.

There are other issues to consider, that is, the nature of vaginal sex not to very much prone to
spreading the virus which is primarily infected via blood during when the female isn't menstruating,
as the female anatomy is designed away from any major blood vessels, whereas anal sex is particularly vulnerable to contact with blood as major blood vessels are located in and around the
(hemmorhoidal inflammation/bleeding)would deem such acts highly dangerous.

37 posted on 12/10/2007 6:02:02 AM PST by america4vr (The ebb and flow of empires have come and gone but America shall forever reign supreme.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
That might fly for, say, 1986, but in 1992 the transmission of AIDS was understood about as well as it is now.

It might have been known to doctors, but it wasn't widely accepted yet by the public. Here's a quote from Wikipedia, about the retirement of Magic Johnson from the NBA after discovering he was HIV-positive. Note the dates:

"Nonetheless, Johnson was still voted into the 1992 All-Star Game, and the press speculated whether he was going to make a comeback. Moreover, many colleagues were wary: as HIV can be transmitted by blood contamination, they argued that Johnson would be a deadly risk if he suffered a bleeding wound while on court..."

38 posted on 12/10/2007 6:41:04 AM PST by HHFi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
I don't understand your reasoning. This is another reason for the libs to want Huck as GOP candidate. They could make a huge smear campaign out of this.

vaudine

39 posted on 12/10/2007 6:47:58 AM PST by vaudine (RO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HHFi

Isn’t the “blood rule” still in effect for both the NBA and the NCAA?


40 posted on 12/10/2007 7:51:10 AM PST by Sloth (Democrats and GOPers are to government what Jeffrey Dahmer and Michael Jackson are to babysitting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson