Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rte66

wow....how could they not have seen him shooting himself with a shotgun????


2,241 posted on 12/11/2007 2:20:45 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2238 | View Replies ]


To: nicmarlo; CindyDawg

Well, perhaps we’ll need to see if some other source corroborates this report.

In looking at the other news articles, most of them say “gunshot wound” and I wouldn’t put it past some of our local newsreaders to transpose that into “shotgun” wound.

We’re the 4-5th or so largest TV market in the US, but we still get some illiterates as news anchors. Not all, but some.


2,246 posted on 12/11/2007 2:45:09 PM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2241 | View Replies ]

To: nicmarlo

See that’s the thing... A close-range blast from a shotgun would cause way more physical damage than a handgun. One would think that a vet and an ex-police officer could immediately tell the difference between a handgun wound, and a shotgun blast. But, perhaps — depending on where he shot himself — the majority of the damage wasn’t visible from the “front”. And, if they didn’t move the body at all I could understand where they could’ve assumed that her bullets were what killed him.


2,275 posted on 12/11/2007 4:01:34 PM PST by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson