Do call when you find out whom Daffy Duck is going to support, will you?
Well, the prosperity part is good and I believe would apply to most of the GOP candidates, but particularly more so to Hunter, Thompson, and Romney.
The peacable part is a problem. We are not at peace. We are in a death struggle (whether some people want to believe it or not) with an ideology that is the abject anti-thesis of our own, and that wants to destroy us. We must fight them, we must wage war on them until they are destroyed and their ideology remomved from the earth or rendered to a hiss and a by-word.
Then there is the rising threat of Red China, which has the potnetial to be an even greater threat over the next 20-30 years.
No, we need an individual who understands these threats and will face them head-on. A warrior who can convince these threats to either cow down, or be destroyed with our big sticks. That is where Chuck and I differ. I see these threats as immediate and beyond the point of "peacable" negotiations if we want America and its prosperity to survive.
The writer needs an editor to correct his grammar and word usage errors.
For example it’s “tier”, not “tear”, although some of the top tier candidates to cause tears in the eyes of conservatives.
And it’s “better than”, not “better then”, unless you simply are placing the debate in the past.
And I can’t think of any reason to write the words “and for his ironically tough image”. It makes me wonder if he knows what the word “ironic” actually means — maybe he thinks it has something to do with “iron”.
why are you posting old stuff, this article was posted before.
Good, just another reason why I won’t vote for him.
Chuck Norris for Vice President 2008 :)
(and just why not?...)
Lately the Bee has been stinging himself.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus