Posted on 12/03/2007 1:52:49 PM PST by YCTHouston
You may have one at home right now: a gun.
Would you use it to stop someone who’s stealing from you or from your neighbor?
It’s what happened earlier this month in Pasadena, but using deadly force can have repercussions that could cost you far more than whatever it was the thieves were after.
(Excerpt) Read more at khou.com ...
NEVER LIE TO COPS OR JUDGES.
They’re professional lie detectors, finely calibrated and backed up by a team of professionals with unlimited budgets.
In Florida before the passage of the Florida “Castle Doctrine” the rule was you had to retreat if opssible before using deadly forsce, today thankfully that is no longer the case.
http://www.gunlaws.com/FloridaCastleDoctrine.htm
Should she have retreated and called the police, knowing that the criminal might steal her car before the cops got there? Should she really be accused of escalating the situation when it was really the criminal who not only started the whole thing by breaking into the car, but escalated it when he pulled a knife and attacked?
Under the new Texas law, she has no duty to retreat from her home, business, or vehicle.
Why give the criminal a fair chance to harm you? Shoot first!
Those three standards/conditions are beyond what the Arlington, Texas PD comprehends.
About six weeks ago a guy killed several people in Fort Worth and kidnapped a young child. He dropped the child off in SE Arlington and told that person that he had more people to take care off.
The Arlington PD cornered him in his vehicle on a residential street. SWAT was called out and he was confined in their perimeter as a confirmed armed, Capital Murder suspect.
After a six hour stand off, the actor drove around the SWAT vehicle and escaped. A vehicle chase ensued and he crashed into Lake Arlington and then shot himself. No LEO fired a shot at the fleeing felon. The APD said that they didn't have a plan to stop such a person.
Interesting how certain black thugs consider the “hood” their sanctuary. Looks like Quantrel X found out what a white “hood” is. I bet he never expected it. Bwahahahahahahahahaha.
I'm a sport.
Is it better to err on the side of staying alive or is it safer to be dead?
Background; what's behind your intended target? A schoolyard?
Age; Is the target going to turn out to be a juvenile?
Last resort; Will a jury find that you didn't use any other means to apprehend or stop the attack?
Knowledge; Is the crime being committed by the crook a FELONY or likely to result in great bodily injury?
I’ve got two kids and a wife to protect. If someone is already in my house I will automatically assume they mean harm as I pull the trigger.
Overall, I thought it was a pretty balanced article, but the author did forget to make that point. Whether you’re alone in the house or have a family in there with you makes a big difference. Someone who wanted to write an article about self-defense should have taken that into account.
I live alone right now, so if someone broke into my place I could retreat to the back room with a gun in my hand and call 911, only shooting the intruder if he came into that room. But if I had a husband and children to worry about, the intruder might kill them if I retreated, so I’d have to go after the intruder. That’s why “must retreat” laws are so dangerous.
If I wake up and find someone in my home, I don't plan to assume that they are just there for my ratty old VCR nor do I plan to take the time to ask. I think I can safely assume that anyone brazen enough to break into my home is there to do grievous injury to my family and will act accordingly.
Anyone who decides to own a gun for home protection needs to first sit down with themselves and decide if they could ever use it against another person and under which conditions they would do so.
Criminals who break into homes would do well to understand that most people who own guns have had that talk with themselves and won't hesitate to use their weapons and defend their homes and families.
Number of lawyers in US=Y
X>Y
Good luck with that, tell it to the judge, I’m sure he’ll believe you.
“Defend yourself if necessary, but hide or run.”
This isn't true everywhere. In some places, if you have defended yourself or your home legally, you cannot be held liable for anything. The criminal's family cannot sue you in Colorado, for example.
I completely agree that nothing I own is worth another person's life, but if they break into my home while I'm there, I'm not going to assume they are there to steal things, but to hurt someone.
*Snip..."Authorities say that on Oct. 12, Arthur Jackson, 32, shot his 36-year-old estranged wife and her two children, ages 13 and 7. Jackson then drove to an Arlington church and handed over his 3-year-old daughter, who was covered in blood but uninjured."
...Despite being blocked in by heavy equipment and armed officers for more than six hours, Jackson somehow managed to slip out and drive away.
..."I'm confident it won't happen again," (APD Chief)Bowman said. After reviewing the report the Arlington City Council agreed that while mistakes were made, good police work prevented others from being hurt.
sounds to me like being a robber is a risky profession, especially here in Texas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.