Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1946658/posts

“Snaring the N-Jihadi”
The Hindustan Times ^ | Washington, December 30, 2007 | Pramit Pal Chaudhuri
Posted on 01/01/2008 12:28:33 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki


1,341 posted on 01/01/2008 1:19:25 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1340 | View Replies ]


To: All

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=waronterror
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=wot

#

Note: The following post is a quote:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1946655/posts

Britain Drops ‘War on Terror’ Label
Military.com ^ | December 28, 2007 | Staff
Posted on 01/01/2008 12:15:19 AM PST by america4vr
The words “war on terror” will no longer be used by the British government to describe attacks on the public, the country’s chief prosecutor said Dec. 27.

Sir Ken Macdonald said terrorist fanatics were not soldiers fighting a war but simply members of an aimless “death cult.”

The Director of Public Prosecutions said: ‘We resist the language of warfare, and I think the government has moved on this. It no longer uses this sort of language.”

London is not a battlefield, he said.

“The people who were murdered on July 7 were not the victims of war. The men who killed them were not soldiers,” Macdonald said. “They were fantasists, narcissists, murderers and criminals and need to be responded to in that way.”

His remarks signal a change in emphasis across Whitehall, where the “war on terror” language has officially been ditched.

Officials were concerned it could act as a recruiting tool for Al Qaeda, which is determined to manufacture a battle between Islam and the West.

The term “Islamic terrorist” will also no longer be used. Officials believe it is unhelpful because it appears to directly link the religion to terrorist atrocities.

In an interview with BBC Radio’s World at One, Macdonald made a fresh attack on plans to extend beyond 28 days the length of time a terror suspect can be held without trial.

He said that the evidence had shown that the existing limit was working well and he accused ministers of legislating on the basis of ‘hypotheticals’.

(Excerpt) Read more at military.com ...


1,342 posted on 01/01/2008 1:22:44 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1341 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson