IS THE NEW YORK TIMES READY TO THROW HILLARY UNDER THE BUS?

1 December 2007 | vanity

[goldstategop]

The libs will abandon Hillary in a heartbeat for someone more electable. In 2004, they abandoned the anointed Howard Dean for John Kerry. They may do the same next year for Barack Obama and leave Hillary behind in the dust.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

[GATOR NAVY]

Further, many and perhaps most voters in 2008 will have been born after 1980.

No way. Older people still vote in far greater numbers than young people.

[robomatik]

" IS THE NEW YORK TIMES READY TO THROW HILLARY UNDER THE BUS"?

[[raising hand]]

i will!!!

[goldstategop]

Ha ha ha ha... Hillary can count on the seasoned citizen vote for sure.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

[shield]

Doubt it...just wishful thinkin’ by the loons.

[Nonstatist]

The libs will abandon Hillary in a heartbeat for someone more electable

That person is defnitely not Barack Obama. Anyone who thinks that must be on Smack. He's a lefty lefty with almost no track record. That would be a dream come true, to me, to see him nominated.

[2ndDivisionVet]

The left’s fawning over that unqualified empty suit is inexplicable, except that they know he would be putty in the hands of whoever gets hold of him first. I am more qualified to be president, and that ain’t saying much!

[the invisib1e hand]

IS THE NEW YORK TIMES READY TO THROW HILLARY UNDER THE BUS?

I would be very surprised.

[Right Wing Assault]

Hillary has never felt more confident!

[Liberty Valance]

[SatinDoll]

Why the photo of Katherine Zeta Jones?

[Scarchin]

I know quite a few libs and NONE of them LIKE Hillary.

I think her momentum has come from the fact that they LOVE Bill and HATE Bush.

In conversations with these libs (they know I’m conservative) they don’t even try to defend her to me.

They are indicating a turn towards Edwards. They like Obama, but are uncomfortable with his lack of experience.

[plain talk]

They aren’t abandoning her. They are just lowering expectations a tad to make her look better when she does win the nomination. There is no way Obama has a chance aginst the Clinton machine. A more seasoned candidate might but Obama is still wet behind the ears. Its a joke he is even running.

[Revolting cat!]

Pravda is the voice of the boomers, who’ll never abandon Saint Joan of Arkansas!

[skinkinthegrass]

....(Fmr. Friend of the Bill) Vince Foster, has no comment. :)

[airborne]

Enter AlGore!

[Liberty Valance]

MoDowd FReeper Lore ...
da rulz

[Billthedrill]

Not a chance. Of course, should Obama get elected the media would quite properly consider that they got him there and expect a commensurate privilege from his administration. They'd be disappointed - only an honest politician stays bought.

Now let's look at a couple of cold facts. Hillary owns the machine that the NY Times is part of whether the "Gay Mafia" on its board like it or not. They either play ball or they're frozen out of her White House, and the Republicans aren't going to come to their rescue after eight straight years of incessant Bush-bashing. They have no choice in the matter. Frank Rich and Mo Dowd can pontificate all they want to and it won't mean a thing. And they'll come around. They don't have any choice either.

[SatinDoll]

Oh...I’m so sorry you seem to be drunk.

(You’re not making any sense, mister.)