[Southack]

"He's correct about that, but only because I informed him of it. Ray-finned fish typically do have TLR-4..." - ahayes

You are such a liar. Here's proof: Southack informs ahayes of TLR-4 in Fish

[ahayes]

Phooie, you have never succeeded in actually naming any of the genes present, in spite of my repeated requests. I tell you what genes and gene families are present and I tell you fish have TLR-4 and that pufferfish may not, providing a nifty reference in case you might want to look it up (which I know you don't or you wouldn't say such silly things).

And look! In the second post I tell you why evolutionists are not surprised to find TLR-4 having a different role in fish!

"This is something that is seen often throughout evolution--a gene used for one purpose eventually takes on a new one. We see the same thing with olfactory genes, many of which are expressed in sperm cells and probably used for chemotaxis."

[ahayes]

And lest anyone should not read your link and be misinformed, I will demonstrate that your reading comprehension does not even allow you to understand your own posts.

To: ahayes

I must have missed your source for TLR4-mediated endotoxin recognition and signaling in Fish (though I admit that you can point to most/all other TLR functions)...

59 posted on 06/04/2007 7:50:14 PM EDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)

You express doubt that TLR-4 is present and request evidence for its existence, which I provide in the next post. You were not informing me of anything, you were doubting the very thing you claim to have "informed" me of.

I will be more charitable and instead of saying you're a liar, as you told me, I will say you just misunderstood your own words. . .