To: js1138
"The only fish for which we have DNA information are not intermediaries between coral and humans." - js1138 There is no DNA on hand that would support Evolutionary Theory. Not in ancient fish. Not in modern fish. Fish simply don't have the immune system functionality of coral and humans.
Further, the notion that "modern" fish aren't intermediaries between coral and humans is supposition backed by no evidence whatsoever.
In short, Evolution fails when tested by DNA.
172 posted on
12/03/2007 1:53:26 PM PST by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
Evolution through natural selection has had unalloyed success whenever challenged by molecular genetic data. There are entire shelves of the library devoted to the productive output of this discipline, it is called “Molecular Evolution”. In short, you could not possibly be more incorrect.
173 posted on
12/03/2007 1:57:02 PM PST by
allmendream
("A Lyger is pretty much my favorite animal."NapoleonD (Hunter 08))
To: Southack
There is no DNA on hand that would support Evolutionary Theory. Not in ancient fish. Not in modern fish. We have no DNA for ancient fish. You acknowledge in a previous post that functions can be lost or modified.
Your continuing to assert the falsehood that modern fish are intemediaries between coral and humans is either dishonest or stupid.
174 posted on
12/03/2007 1:58:54 PM PST by
js1138
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson