[samtheman]

The “Democratic leaders” get to decide who can vote and when they can vote?

Doesn’t sound very “democratic” to me.

Maybe the DNC should call in Hugo Chavez for advice on how to run an election.

[knarf]

OK ... maybe I don't understand the political process as much as I thought ... but ... it sure seems strange that a group of un-elected people can eliminate another group of people (delegates are voted on aren't they?) that have a direct role in choosing the office being vied for.

Aren't the delegates the ones that say, "Mr speaker ... the state of -------------- casts all its votes for ------------ " ?

So, if this is something that is legal, we never had control over whom got elected for an office ... right?

And if the RATS can do this ... it establishes a precedent for the elimination of all elections, thus destroying the entire representative Republic form of government/elections we're supposed to have.

No wonder third worlders want to come here ... The USSA is just like home ... but with more land to destroy and money to squander.

[Grampa Dave]

Thanks for posting your great summary. I was thinking of Hugo, Castro or IMANUTJOB being in charge of the rat party:

“The “Democratic leaders” get to decide who can vote and when they can vote?

Doesn’t sound very “democratic” to me.

Maybe the DNC should call in Hugo Chavez for advice on how to run an election.”

[billmor]

“The “Democratic leaders” get to decide who can vote and when they can vote?Doesn’t sound very “democratic” to me.

Maybe the DNC should call in Hugo Chavez for advice on how to run an election.”

Why when they have 2 idjuts already: Peloski and Reed