Posted on 11/30/2007 9:07:21 AM PST by traviskicks
You can pull someone’s leg, and you can pull off a feat, but you don’t normally “pull off that feet”.
As far as being re-elected. So was Murtha. They’re both a couple of pork kings and unfortunately pork buys votes.
As far as future re-elections, from what I understand, now that his nitwit pro-jihadist sympathies are out there in the open, he might have trouble the next time he tries getting re-elected from his district.
Maybe he’ll bring Murtha in to assist in his campaign. They’re birds of a feather.
You're right. They don't.
If they can hurt the good Republican candidates in the primaries by pumping a loon, then so be it.
Apparently, you would you prefer someone like Huck, Hillary, Rudy who each have 1,001 "creative" ways to plan your life.
‘If they can hurt the good Republican candidates in the primaries by pumping a loon, then so be it.’
Exactly.
Watch in the first quarter of next year, and they encourage Ron Paul to run third party...it won’t hurt the GOP, but they aren’t bright enough to figure that part out.
If his support is so high, why is he not doing better in the national polls?
What is he spending all his money on?
Is the money even real?
Does he get to use what he doesn’t spend on a nice retirement?
The sad thing is that they actually believe Ron Paul can win. Howard Dean actually led the polls before his flameout.
If Ron Paul has any guts, which I doubt, he should not file for re-election to his House seat by the January deadline.
We’ll see.
Exactly. McCain shoved Ron Paul's head in a toilet when he said "Your isolationist approach is why Hitler came to power". Thompson is just biding his time patiently. He knows when it's time to say things.
McCain shoved Ron Paul's head in a toilet when he said "Your isolationist approach is why Hitler came to power".Good imagery. The head is a good place for the heads of Murtha and Paul.
‘So you think that support for free markets, liberty, and individual rights across the board is nothing more than “contraryism?” ‘
Could you please cut and paste the post where I said this?
(good luck)
The polls exclude Paul's name & they are polling the same registered Republicans who voted in 2004, on land-line phones. Many of Paul's supporters are independents and newcomers.
Money doesn't necessarily help one shed the "Blame American First", "Gold Standard NOW!" lunatic image he's worked so hard to cultivate, does it?
Labels unfairly assigned to him by the establishment media and GOP party hacks.
It is, though, entertaining to see so many lefties give their money to an anti-war libertarian with absolutely no chance of garnering the nomination
They can give and give to their heart's content, but they are supporting someone who opposes all of their goals.
He may also be on track to another record, most spent on a primary Loser :)
Politico is pretty much a DBM outlet from the last few days. Hardly the stellar credibility source.
Honestly, the time has come for a purge of Ron Paul’s traitorous supporters from this site. They are disruptive and dangerous to the American cause.
Ironic how Free Republic was leading the charge against military interventionism in Bosnia under Clinton’s command.
Interesting how this Paulbot supporter’s hit piece sounds exactly like a Democrat hit piece. Must be because those ‘quaker’ members write the scripts, among other things mentioned on another thread.
Sorry but it's just not happening. Paul has stated millions of times that he's not going to run 3rd party, as he learned from his bid in 1988.
Which is fine. Theyre all a bunch of jihadist-boot-lickers who would never vote for a strong-military candidate anyway.
Misread the electorate at your own will. Many people are concerned about the war and do not want a long-term commitment in Iraq. Personally, I disagree with Paul on an immediate withdrawal, but we don't need to stay there for generations with permanent bases and such. The war is costing billions of dollars a year. Why do you think the dollar is falling?
If there was no L Ron, theyd all talk themselves into voting for the beast.
Actually, they'd probably just stay home or vote 3rd party like they've always done, and then we can enjoy another election of GOP flacks and their lock-steppers whining about those evil "Losertarians" causing their RINO to lose.
odd, I dont picture long hair unemployed maggot types as having alot of extra cabbage to donate.(sarc)
Correct me if I am wrong. I thought you said that Ron Paul was characterized by contraryism. If not, what were you saying?
No, it's you asking a ridiculous question.
He wont win his congresssional seat again next year.
Get real. Democrats don't even field candidates against Paul anymore. If they can't beat him, what makes you think another Republican can?
He has a scam going. The way to go is to convert his funds into Swiss Francs. You have to wonder who is screwing whos wife here.
You're talking about a man who refused to participate in the lucrative Congressional retirement pension and has been married to the same woman for 50 years. Lay off the sauce.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.