Posted on 11/29/2007 2:40:33 PM PST by greyfoxx39
After spending the day facing accusations it stacked the deck against the Republican presidential contenders by having Democratic backers ask video questions during its debate, CNN on Thursday responded that it doesn't know what the fuss is all about.
The cable news network, in collaboration with video Web site YouTube, hosted the Wednesday night debate that had more than 30 voters pose questions to the Republican candidates. It later turned out that several of those questioners are actively supporting Democratic candidates.
"The whole point of these ground-breaking CNN/YouTube debates is to focus on substantive questions of concern to real people and to throw open the process to a wider range of Americans all around the country. CNN cared about what you asked, not who you were. This was the case for both the Democratic and the Republican CNN/YouTube debates," CNN said in a statement issued late in the day.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
He made an idiotic point. Screaming wholly absurd baseless allegations at Fox because they try present an objective picture of all the candidate instead of just screaming your personal dogma of mindless hate for a particular candidate is utter nonsense.
NO ONE gets 100% of what they want out of politics. So what are you 100%er willing to give up to get some good SC Justices? Some serious tax reform? A serious energy policy? Someone who will do something about the border? Movement on Soc Security reform?
What I am hearing around here is you people think everything should be done to accommodate your personal political whimsies while you should have to give up nothing at all that you want done.
Not even Ronald Mangus Reagan would of been able to delivered that to you 100%ers!
Right —are they going to ask the Dims what their view on the Bible is? Are they going to ask them about the abortion issue? Let’s get them on record on issues that are important.
How do they feel about the confederate flag? People in South Carolina want to know how the dims feels about this as well....
Spineless lamestream media will only ask the tough questions, like “what do you prefer, diamonds or pearls?”
bah....
That was a quote from previous post, but as for my vote, yes, it will be Republican, lower tax rates are more likely.
Perhaps Conservative folks will finally wake up to just what sort of gutter slime we are fighting here and quit being PR drones for Hillary's camp with their perpetual whining at the GOP rantings.
Rather than trying to insult me into seeing things your way, why don't you answer the question posed? How you propose that we get the leadership of the republican party to understand that the constant drift to the left must stop? What we have been doing isn't working. Also, since you've got this all figured out, tell me how conservative causes get advanced if we continue to vote for politicians that do not represent these causes?
Each and every time conservatives settle for less than conservative, the ground lost is never regained. Once these people know that we will hold our nose and vote for the party no matter what, they are very comfortable straying from the prior principles of the party.
Like I said, voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil. If you're okay with that, go ahead. If you want me to change my mind, you're gonna have to do better than name calling. Even a cursory review of your posting history would indicate that you might have trouble with that task.
“...some of us are done with voting for the one who stinks the least.”
Amen!
Um. . .okay.
On Judges alone the current crop of GOPers have done far more good for the future of the Conservative movement then all the screaming morons in the Junk Media with their perpetual whining and bitching ever have, or will, do.
Politics is a game of percentages, you NEVER get 100% of only what YOU want and NOTHING that you don’t want. NOTHING in politics is ever perfect. Not even Reagan was.
It is only screaming morons ranting into their microphone, who never actually done anything in life, who think it can be. Past time Freepers start thinking for themselves rather then mindlessly regurgitate the dogmas spewed by the never been anything ranting heads.
I don’t listen to the radio and I have no idea what you are ranting about. What I did notice is that you didn’t answer the questions. I can only assume that what your answer would really boil down to is that you believe conservatives should just give up and get with the new liberalism of the republican party. No thanks.
Kathleen Wiley should showe up for the next dem debate. She has a few questions for Hillary she still has not answered. That would be a Kodak moment for sure.
How about Osama/Huckleberry. The politics of Hopeless.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.