Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HamiltonJay
I understand your concern, but it's worth noting that a big difference with Japan is that it has a lot of what might be called "institutional stagnation" -- i.e., no population growth, limited acceptance of immigrants, etc. -- that tends to act as an enormous anchor on their economy.

The U.S. has to cope with some of these factors, but to a far lesser extent than Japan did.

34 posted on 11/28/2007 12:44:25 PM PST by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
no population growth, limited acceptance of immigrants, etc. -- that tends to act as an enormous anchor on their economy.

How does this differ from what a large fraction of people on here want for this country?

35 posted on 11/28/2007 12:47:14 PM PST by garbanzo (Government is not the solution to our problems. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

I’m not implying the US is Japan, I’m just point out that rate cuts are limited in their impact, and the mess of the housing and credit crunch are not going to be alleviated by a rate cut.

There was a long run of good times, and now the piper will be paid. Fed can do things, but it can’t eliminate this.

At the end of the day, the bulk of the economy can be traced back to real property... and the value of that is contracting and going to continue to for quite some time. Rate Cuts won’t change that.


39 posted on 11/28/2007 12:50:20 PM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson