Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texan a vigilante or brave law abider? ( Called 911 and ask for cops before burglars escaped....)
Los Angeles Times ^ | November 25, 2007 | Miguel Bustillo, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

Posted on 11/27/2007 6:15:36 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

A 911 recording of a man who shot and killed two burglary suspects has stirred debate on whether he should be condemned or praised.

PASADENA, TEXAS -- When he saw two men pry into his neighbor's house with a crowbar one afternoon earlier this month, Joe Horn did what many people would do: He called 911.

But when police had not shown up by the time the suspects were about to leave, the 61-year-old retiree did something most people probably would not: He stepped outside with his 12-gauge shotgun and killed them.

"I'm not going to let them get away with this," Horn told the 911 dispatcher, who responded: "Property's not worth killing someone over."

Seconds later, the sound of a gun being loaded could be heard on the 911 tape, followed by a warning -- "Move [and] you're dead" -- and then three bursts of gunfire. Miguel DeJesus, 38, and Diego Ortiz, 30, both of whom had small-time criminal histories, died of their wounds.

The six-minute recording of Horn's anger, frustration and eagerness to take the law into his own hands has made him the focus of a national controversy. Critics condemn him as a vigilante bent on meting out murderous justice. Admirers praise him as a courageous hero whom any law abider would love to have next door.

"Why is he still a free man?" Linda E. Edwards wrote in a letter to the Houston Chronicle.

"Joe Horn gets a Texas 'attaboy' from me," countered John E. Meagher in the next letter. "Justice was served, law or not."

As the debate rages on talk radio and cable-TV news shows, Horn remains free.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Texas; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: emergency911; justice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-173 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Actually, most Americans are very reluctant to employ deadly force in such circumstances; there are hundreds of thousands to millions - depending on how you count - of incidents yearly where people report the use of use a firearm to prevent a crime, but only a few hundred justifiable homicides… most people will shoot to kill only as a last resort.

And IMO, that’s a healthy thing; a culture where large numbers of people a truly feel they are justified in killing someone for committing a property crime – a opposed to just fantasying about how good it would feel to do it when they walk out in the morning and find the driver’s side window in shards on the ground - is a culture in real trouble.

This is something most people understand quite well when they see members of other cultures in homicidal rages over fetishes about whether you should wear a beard or cover you hair, or drive a car if you are female, or charge interest on a loan – that it’s just nuts to kill people over the righteousness of your appearance, or the sacred nature of human sexuality, or the blasphemous nature of money-lending for interest.

It’s just that some of the same people see it as perfectly rational to shoot someone if they are trying to steal a burger off your backyard grill, because that’s not a fetish, that’s about the sacred nature of Property, so it’s perfectly rational and even righteous to kill someone in defense of the principle, no matter how small the crime.


61 posted on 11/27/2007 8:09:40 PM PST by M. Dodge Thomas (Opinion based on research by an eyewear firm, which surveyed 100 members of a speed dating club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: M. Dodge Thomas
Oh Bravo Sierra.

If someone tresspasses to rob you of your property, then you must consider your life at risk. It is a terrible thing...not sanctioned in the sense that it is gleaful or good...but sanctioned in the sense that it is a horrible necessity to defend your life.

Texas law allows people to use deadly force to protect their own property to stop arson, burglary, robbery, theft or criminal mischief at night, precisely because when criminals are committing these crimes, they must be deemed a mortal threat to your person.

62 posted on 11/27/2007 8:16:32 PM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: M. Dodge Thomas
Being this nation was founded on a principle of rights, including Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, and almost slipped in was ‘the Pursuit of Property’ one can only wonder, why so many laws protect property, if the right of property is to be trashed. I realize the Supreme Court said eminent domain, and property can be taken, but is this what the Founders of this Nation intended? Mr. Horn protected his neighbors from the pursuit of those who chose stealing property of his neighbors. Why would anyone want to condemn him, unless that one cares not for Life, Liberty, or the Pursuit of Happiness? For in this case there was a Pursuit of Happiness for one's neighbors by resistance to thugs.

Someone will be angry with me, if I do not leave this forum for tonight. Carry on the Good Fight, even if a shot or twelve is necessary, my Fellow Americans (with Liberty and Justice for All) Dear Fellow FReepers.

63 posted on 11/27/2007 8:28:25 PM PST by no-to-illegals (God Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform, Our Heroes. And Vote For Mr. Duncan Hunter, America! TLWNW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Everyone is missing one of the most important points here - what if the man was mistaken? It said that he didn’t know his neighbors very well - what if there was a reason for those guys breaking into the house that he didn’t know about? I have broken into houses plenty of times because of special cases - even used a crowbar once - and they were all special cases but perfectly justified nonetheless. There has to be measure of restraint for justice to be served. What if these were teenagers or women? Where was everybody else on the block? After 7 minutes, I would have had every able-bodied male on the block standing outside the house waiting. If it were my house and I was gone, I wouldn’t want the guy to just shoot anyone coming out. I have a bunch of teenagers at home and there’s no telling what’s going on even when they’re being good.
64 posted on 11/27/2007 8:34:09 PM PST by Timothy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Sounds like your boss failed to have the necessary ingredient ~ a broken doorlock, window, or some other thing that would indicate forced entry.

Always good to leave the doors locked when you aren't at home.

Anyway, this guy called just after 2 PM. Highschools throughout that part of Houston and its suburbs let out at 2 PM. No doubt a fair percentage of the active police complement were out directing traffic related to that daily event.

Still, the guy only waited 6 minutes before shooting these guys.

Interesting that the cops have not yet said that any crime at all was commited. This story is not over.

65 posted on 11/27/2007 8:35:15 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

Please give us an internet reference to a this story that tells about a “crowbar”.


66 posted on 11/27/2007 8:38:09 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

The newspaper’s use of the inflammatory word “vigilante” is completely out of place here. In bygone days, vigilantes strapped on weapons and left their homes to seek out fugitives. When Mr. Horn woke that morning, he had plans to pursue no one. The criminals disrupted his peaceful day by invading the sanctity of his neighbor’ home. Horn was being a good neighbor, not a vigilante. His first choice clearly was that the police arrive in a timely fashion. It’s difficult to put ourselves in the shoes of this elderly man as he loaded his weapon and left the safety of his home to confront the criminals. Fear, adrenalin, the desire to do the right thing. Some of his language may be interpreted as bravado, as he steeled himself for a confrontation that could easily have gone the other way. No grand jury of decent Americans would indict him. He has earned the gratitude and support of all law abiding people. If politically-driven prosecutors attempt to lynch this hero, a tsunami of public indignation should be loosed upon them.
67 posted on 11/27/2007 8:38:39 PM PST by Godwin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Liberty Valance
A few years ago when Ann Richards was governor she decided that there was no reason to lock up people who had only committed burglaries of residences. She and her gang of libs saw no reason to lock up for 10 or 15 years people who had merely broken into homes and burglarized them.

In other words, only property had been stolen. She didn’t see why nonviolent criminals should have such long prison sentences... if any.

The band wagon was proceeding just fine until it was pointed out that many of these burglars were actually rapists.

In fact, if I recall correctly, a famous penologist who had been the warden of Sing Sing prison for many years testified in Austin that he had never met a man convicted of burglary who was not also a rapist if given an opportunity. It turned out that in many cases if women were in a home that was being burglarized they were raped.

Many of the allegedly "nonviolent" burglars had been given extremely long prison sentences to keep these women from having to go to court and testify in public about what had been done to them.

If somebody is breaking into a home in broad daylight, he, and whatever scumbag friends he has brought along, has earned the right to be killed on the spot. Don't tell me "it was only property."

Good shooting Mr Horn. As a taxpayer in the Great State of Texas, I appreciate your saving us the expense of a trial. I'm just sorry we can't check the dirt bags' wallets to see if they have enough of their own money to buy you a new box of shotgun shells to replace those you used.

68 posted on 11/27/2007 8:38:59 PM PST by Brucifer (G. W. Bush "The dog ate my copy of the Constitution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

There’s a lesson to be learned here: “if you’re not robbing someone’s house, the odds of you getting killed go down considerably”.


69 posted on 11/27/2007 8:39:22 PM PST by svanni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

They knocked down the fence and drove into the backyard under cover of a privacy fence the broke into the home, loaded up the truck/car and away they went. bigtime forced entry


70 posted on 11/27/2007 8:40:03 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Timothy
I have broken into houses plenty of times because of special cases - even used a crowbar once - and they were all special cases but perfectly justified nonetheless.

You made good points in your post, but the above comment really got my attention. What were the circumstances that required you to break into someone's home?

71 posted on 11/27/2007 8:41:32 PM PST by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Timothy
On an earlier thread on the same case I noted that I'd helped a friend break in his own house after he'd recovered it from a bad tenant in court.

The very same folks who say Mr. Horn is right to shoot these guys who went into the house next door (after he heard glass break) also told me that I and my friend should have called the cops to assist us in getting into his house.

I'd suggest they are inconsistent.

Rather, I now think we should have gone armed to my friend's home and if anyone even so much as looked at us more than a second, shot them down like dogs in the street since it would be quite obvious they wanted to fire on us without provocation.

72 posted on 11/27/2007 8:44:24 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7jqLie6-Y0

I think Mr. Horn can be heard describing the criminals as using a crowbar. Check around 2:09 into the audio.


73 posted on 11/27/2007 8:45:24 PM PST by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
Give the man a medal!

And go after any DA or prosecutor that goes after the shooter. End their career, and make an example of them.

Enough of this crime BS.

74 posted on 11/27/2007 8:56:53 PM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter
He said “You move you’re dead” and the gunshots came immediately after that.

Where I come from that is considered more than enough fair warning.

Sounds to me like someone moved.

75 posted on 11/27/2007 8:57:21 PM PST by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Frankly, I hate the idea of vigilante force. However, as time goes on and respect for individual rights are overcome by criminal intent..the police and sheriffs will not be able to keep up with demand. So should we roll over and give in to criminal activity?

These individuals could just have well killed or raped in the process of their “little” crime. Maybe not at that house, but the next.

If this gentleman would like to relocate..I would welcome him in my neighborhood.

And..yes..I’m from Texas. :)


76 posted on 11/27/2007 9:12:46 PM PST by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: berdie

With Mr. Horn next door the last thing you want to have happen is to forget your house keys and get locked out.


77 posted on 11/27/2007 9:14:37 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Brucifer

Well said Brucifer.


78 posted on 11/27/2007 9:14:59 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
After listening to the 911 tape..I got the impression he was relatively sure it wasn’t the owner of the house. If my neighbor had a bead on me with a shotgun and said “stop” I think I’d identify myself..real quick. But that’s just me.
79 posted on 11/27/2007 9:24:32 PM PST by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This guy did what any concerned neighbor would do.

The dispatcher is clueless. So is the Drive By Media that is covering

OK, Mr or Madam Dispatcher and Drive By “Journalists”. Answer this:

1) What if the neighbors would been the house being beat up by another individual(s)?

2) What if the neighbors would have elderly unable to physically defend themselves.

3) Worse that that, what if the neighbors had female children and the parents left them at home alone?

The old adage, shoot first and ask questions is very applicable. I bet you anything these thieves had criminal records and spent time in jail.

About three weeks ago, we had some kids ( I think) pull a prank on us about 9:30 PM on a school night. They came to our front door and pounded as if they were about to knock it down. The worst came to my mind as I jumped away from the kitchen sink (was washing a dish) and I ran to my bedroom and got my Piece out and called 911. I didn’t know if someone was trying to commit a home invasion or it was a school intitation prank which we assume it was because some of our neighbors said on other nights they had their doorbells rang really late or a simple knock on the door and when they got the door, no one was there.

Anyway, I told the police officer that if they catch these kids in action one day doing this, they might want to tell them that Texas law now protects the homeowner and what they did in the case of my door, would be an action were the law would protect me.

80 posted on 11/27/2007 9:24:55 PM PST by The South Texan (The Drive By Media is America's worst enemy and American people don't know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson