OK, I'll bite.
There's an old saying:
"He may be an S.O.B., but he's OUR S.O.B.".
If all we are given is a choice between two S.O.B.'s, wouldn't it be logically preferable to at least have _our_ S.O.B. in office, instead of _theirs_?
Just wondering....
- John
Fishrrman, read post 357 about checking our principals at the door. Thanks again stockstrader for the reminder.
If it is the SOB (per you) we do not like as our nominee, it really would depend on who the SOB had on his ticket.
As some of the freepers who would bash some for not supporting Rudy, are the same who are saying they would support anyone but Paul too cheers. Double standard? So therefore, Hillary still wins.
Fish, also read 352 by E/T. He has a quote from Rudy on Hillary. One and the same.
As I wrote before, we have some time, little time, to make sure Rudy is not our SOB nomination.