Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRAQ: WHAT WENT RIGHT -- COURAGE, SKILL, LUCK AND EXHAUSTION
New York Post ^ | November 21, 2007 | Ralph Peters

Posted on 11/21/2007 5:23:44 AM PST by Aristotelian

THE situation in Iraq has im proved so rapidly that Democrats now shun the topic as thoroughly as they shun our troops when the cameras aren't around. . . .

What happened? How did this startling turnabout come to pass? Why does the good news continue to compound? . . .

We didn't quit: Even as some of us began to suspect that Iraqi society was hopelessly sick, our troops stood to and did their duty bravely. The tenacity of our soldiers and Marines in the face of mortal enemies in Iraq and blithe traitors at home is the No. 1 reason why Iraq has turned around. . . .

Gen. David Petraeus took command: Petraeus brought three vital qualities to our effort: He wants to win, not just keep the lid on the pot; he never stops learning and adapting, and he provides top-cover for innovative subordinates. . . .

The surge: While the increase in troop numbers was important, allowing us to consolidate gains in neighborhoods we'd rid of terrorists and insurgents, the psychological effect of the surge was crucial.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; ralphpeters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
Public opinion lags behind the news -- most especially, when the news isn't to the liking of the liberal media establishment, the MSM. But the more articles like this that appear, the sooner public opinion will shift on Iraq. And it could shiftly dramatically.

Americans like to think of themselves as winners. They like to back winners. They like to associate with winners. Thus, as Iraq comes to be viewed as a winning cause, the tide of public sentiment will get on the winning bandwagon. This will leave Dem candidates in a very awkward position next November.

1 posted on 11/21/2007 5:23:45 AM PST by Aristotelian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

the nitwit Dimms have shifted on this. NOW they’re whining and complaining that the ‘political’ situation in Iraq is a mess. The Dims just hate to see America win.


2 posted on 11/21/2007 5:29:33 AM PST by Jazzman1 (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
"As for the grunts of 2-12 Infantry who made it all possible, their motto is "Ducti Amore Patria," or "Having been led by love of country."

On Thanksgiving Day, be thankful for such men."

Amen!

3 posted on 11/21/2007 5:33:19 AM PST by LZ_Bayonet (There's Always Something.............And there's always something worse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

Winning is good. So, is there any plan to bring the troops home after victory or will we have permanent military bases there?


4 posted on 11/21/2007 5:36:03 AM PST by Hatband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
"Americans like to think of themselves as winners. They like to back winners. They like to associate with winners."

Americans especially love underdog winners.

If we come from behind to win this thing, it will be that much more glorious!
5 posted on 11/21/2007 5:42:56 AM PST by joseph20 (...to ourselves and our Posterity...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hatband

“Winning is good. So, is there any plan to bring the troops home after victory or will we have permanent military bases there?”

With the circumstances in Iran it wouldn’t make a lot of sense to give up our presence in Iraq. More than 60 years after WWII, we are still in Europe. The key is to end conflict, not necessarily to abandon the country.


6 posted on 11/21/2007 5:46:41 AM PST by billhilly (I was republican when republican wasn't cool. (With an apology to Barbara Mandrell.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hatband
"Winning is good. So, is there any plan to bring the troops home after victory or will we have permanent military bases there?"

Oh I'm sure we'll maintain permanent bases there. It would be foolish not to. Probably way out in the desert where nobody gets too excited about them but still allow us to project power in the region.

They're breeding new bad guys that need killin all the time. We just got a little bit ahead of them for a while.

7 posted on 11/21/2007 5:48:07 AM PST by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

If this country was united the terrorists would have given up long ago

What keeps them going is the left wing idiots in this country


8 posted on 11/21/2007 5:54:29 AM PST by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
For all Bush’s faults, you have to hand it to him for his perseverance.
9 posted on 11/21/2007 6:02:24 AM PST by Aristotelian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

The War is Ending and Victory is Here, thanks to President Bush.

Pray for W and Our Victorious Troops


10 posted on 11/21/2007 6:03:44 AM PST by bray (Think "Betray U.S." Think Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

So, we’re into the war about 470 billion dollars so far. That’s roughly 95 billion per year. After victory the costs of occupation should go down. How much do you expect to pay for the continued occupation of Iraq? Annually and for the projected 60 years?


11 posted on 11/21/2007 6:16:27 AM PST by Hatband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

AMERICANS! TONIGHT DEMOCRATS DINE IN HEEELLLLLL!!!


12 posted on 11/21/2007 6:18:51 AM PST by steel_resolve (If you can't stand behind our troops, then please stand in front...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hatband
"How much do you expect to pay for the continued occupation of Iraq? Annually and for the projected 60 years?"

Not as much as we pay for the continued occupation of Europe, Japan and Korea.

13 posted on 11/21/2007 6:20:40 AM PST by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

Well, how much does it cost to occupy Europe, Japan and Korea?


14 posted on 11/21/2007 6:24:06 AM PST by Hatband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hatband

You seem like a shallow thinker.....of course we will have a military presence there forever, to keep peace and order in the VOLATILE middle east....is that you, Dennis??


15 posted on 11/21/2007 6:26:06 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

What went “right” with Iraq is the Bush Administration did what it should have done years ago - more boots on the ground.

Unfornate he had to blow mid-term elections and not a few American lives not doing what he should have done in the first place.

But retrospect is always simple.


16 posted on 11/21/2007 6:26:56 AM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hatband

Go away and PRAY that your kids and grandkids aren’t BOMBED at the Mall since you want the white flag raised.


17 posted on 11/21/2007 6:27:34 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

Last night on ‘The Panel’... Krauthammer likened The Surge and the turning of the Sunni’s against al Qaeda to the landing at Inchon. While I wouldn’t use that analogy... a sea-change HAS occured throughout Iraq from the bottom up. And that’s the BEST way for it to happen.


18 posted on 11/21/2007 6:28:45 AM PST by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Shallow thinking beats not thinking at all.


19 posted on 11/21/2007 6:47:13 AM PST by Hatband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; FARS; Ernest_at_the_Beach; knighthawk; Marine_Uncle; SandRat; Steel Wolf; CAP; ...

“Sorry, Muqtada - that’s what you get for believing The New York Times.” ping


20 posted on 11/21/2007 6:50:44 AM PST by elhombrelibre (RUN Paul - a man proudly putting al Qaeda's interest ahead of America's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson