To: rellimpank
The hope, which we share, is that the court will rise above the hard-right ideology of some justices to render a decision respectful of the Constitution’s text and the violent consequences of denying government broad room to regulate guns. The fear is that it will not.It sure is nice to see the New York Times shaking in their suspenders.
7 posted on
11/21/2007 5:18:41 AM PST by
shekkian
To: shekkian
the violent consequences of denying government broad room to regulate guns.The NYT is equating an outright ban on gun ownership with "regulation". They two are not the same.
17 posted on
11/21/2007 5:45:51 AM PST by
randita
To: shekkian
those sentences show that they are really afraid theyre gonna lose on this thing.
It should give us all hope.
26 posted on
11/21/2007 6:22:13 AM PST by
Armedanddangerous
(Chuin, Master of Sinanju (emeritus))
To: shekkian
Did you READ that quote?
The NYT is saying that being “respectful of the Constitution’s text” is something that they oppose!
Quite an admission, though we already knew this about the left...
37 posted on
11/21/2007 7:28:42 AM PST by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson