Let’s go back and replay this conversation.
You said ID was science.
I said, yes, if you also think like Behe that astrology was science.
You said that was a blatant lie.
I produced a quotation of Behe’s exact words saying that astrology was science.
You say you don’t care that Behe did say that and called my statement above “false and misleading”, in spite of it being an exact quotation.
I have a lot of surreal conversations at FR.
Astrology looks into the future. ID looks into the past.
The Man Made Global Climate Change crowd also look into the future but I never see condemnation of them on the PBS threads about ID.
Is it science? Or is the Global Warming Scare a doomsday cult of a different sort?
[[Let’s go back and replay this conversation.
You said ID was science.
I said, yes, if you also think like Behe that astrology was science.
You said that was a blatant lie.
I produced a quotation of Behe’s exact words saying that astrology was science.
You say you don’t care that Behe did say that and called my statement above “false and misleading”, in spite of it being an exact quotation.
I have a lot of surreal conversations at FR.
]]
Not playing htis little rabbit trail round and round- this is my last reply to htis issue- Behe’s OPINION about astrology and ID have ABSOLUTELY nothign to do with FACTUAL evidences of the actual science itself- Behe is welcome to his OPINION outside of ID, and I could really care less what his opinion is about it, it is the FACTS of ID science that interest me and nothign esle. Behe could beleive God is an eternally alive orange for all I care- but it’s his FACTS about intelligent design present in nature that are the issue and the heart of ID and NOT his outside OPINION- comprende?