... You take goals of a MINOR institute amoung the science of ID and you pretend they are the end all be all of ID science, you post their goals which are Entirely scienctific [sic], claim they are not, and give absolutely NO proof or rebuttle [sic] or explanation as to why they are not (Even though it’s obvious that there is absolutely nothing in those goals that is unscientific) and you continue to post irrelevent material such as insitutute’s [sic] statements of faith as thouigh those statements of faith somehow invalidate the sound and entirely valid science of ID being conducted all over hte [sic] world by competent and highly skilled scientists- ...
Could you please list some of the major ID scientists who aren't affiliated with DI, and also the major ID research institutes?
DI has a wholel ist of 700+ scientists who aren’t affiliated with them- they simply signed DI’s statement concerning the issue that Darwinian evolution was a broken and impossible hypothesis and who simply beleive that design is evident and has an intelligent agent- they make no statement about what that agent might be, but throuhg their research have come to hte logical conclusion that MaCROEVolution is impossible, and that intelligent design is evident.