Posted on 11/19/2007 4:28:44 PM PST by camerakid400
Lawyers for Rep. John P. Murtha will appeal a recent ruling advancing a defamation lawsuit brought against the Pennsylvania Democrat by a U.S. Marine under investigation for killing Iraqi civilians.
Justice Department lawyers representing Murtha on Nov. 16 filed notice that they planned to appeal a federal district court judges Sept. 28 ruling allowing the lawsuit to proceed and ordering Murtha to give sworn testimony in the case.
Marine Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich sued Murtha in August 2006, accusing the 17-term congressman of defaming him during a news conference last year on the Nov. 19, 2005 killings of Iraqi civilians in Haditha.
Wuterich charges that Murtha publicly and falsely accused him and other Marines involved in the Haditha incident of cold-blooded murder and war crimes and of attempting a cover-up, according to court documents.
Military prosecutors initially charged four enlisted Marines including Wuterich with murder and accused four officers of dereliction of duty for failing to adequately investigate the incident.
Charges against four Marines have been dropped and two others will face court-martial, but not for murder.
After a hearing that concluded Sept. 6, an investigating officer recommended Wuterich face court-martial for negligent homicide. Marine Lt. Gen. James Mattis, the commander charged with court-martial authority in the case, has yet to decide whether he will stand trial.
Murtha meanwhile had been ordered to sit for a deposition Nov. 27 to help determine whether he was acting in his official capacity as a U.S. government employee when he made the Haditha comments, as his lawyers have argued.
If the court determines Murtha indeed was acting in his official capacity, the U.S. government could be substituted as the defendant a move that would effectively neuter the case because the federal government cannot be sued for libel.
But Wuterichs lawyer, Mark S. Zaid, said Monday that the deposition now likely will be delayed, pending a determination from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The court will have to determine whether it has the jurisdiction to hear Murthas appeal at this stage or if it should wait until a lower court determines the fate of Wuterichs lawsuit.
U.S. Attorney Darrell C. Valdez, who represents Murtha, did not respond to a request for comment.
Stay strong Sgt. Wuterich! Thank you for your service.
Funny, the CNN video of Murtha condemning the Marines of Haditha is scrambled..Here is the URL to check it out..
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/world/2006/05/18/mcintyre.haditha.update.cnn
nothing like a little obstruction of justice eh ?
The pork ad application is just brilliant! Bravo.
You know, Murtha ought to know better. Murtha is a former marine, but guessing by what he says about brother Marines, im sure a lot of you Marines think of him as Ex not Former.
Murtha is a hollow shell of himself, who used the sacrifices of the good men around him for his own personal gain. Point blank, the only difference between John Kerry and John Murtha, was the service they picked.
John Murtha doesnt deserve to be mentioned in teh same breath as his brother marines. Quite simply, hes a piece of crap. He (john murtha) is a peice of trash who earned his office by taking advantage of the men he served with to look respectable and honorable.
Honor, cannot be bought or borrowed sir, and you have stolen the honor and integrity of others. In true time, cheats liars theives, always show their true colors. You, Congressman Murtha, have shown that rule is true, and you have finally shown your depravity, dishonor, dishonesty, and your traitorous nature.
You, congressman murtha, are a piece of $#it.
ev
we ad guys have our moments.............lol
Bill Richardson as the original Metro-Mexican
is another
Cordially,
I hope that the SGT has the charges dropped, and that murtha gets his fat ass nailed to a wall.
But in the end, it ain't gonna matter, darlin', cause we'll put a boot in his ass....It's the American way...
Thanks for the link...sniff...I've never seen it before. Awesome and our guys sure liked it.
Your last sentence is the kick in the posterior that hurts.
Yup.
I consider Murtha an ex-Marine, as well as Lee Harvey Oswald and Clayton Lonetree.
As the current Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps said at our Retiree’s Birthday Ball last Saturday evening, there is no such thing as a “former” Marine.
We are Marines from the day we graduated boot camp until the day we die, and beyond.
Semper Fidelis,
fontman
Retired master sergeant of Marines
1970-1990
This lawsuit by the Marine should proceed - Murtha should have remembered that he WAS a Marine, and Marine officers are supposed to take care of Marines. Murtha has prejudiced the case. Hopefully this lawsuit will proceed, and rule in the Marine’s favor - maybe this will shut off some of the reserve tanks of hot air that politicians are able to bring up out of their magazines. If I were the judge, heard the evidence, and then ruled against Murtha, part of my judgement would be to strip Murtha of the title “U.S. Marine” - because he sure ain’t one in my book. I hope I never see him wearing a USMC lapel pin or tie tack - it might be unceremoniously removed from his person lapel or tie since he has not proven himself to remember that he ever was one. Some Marines, not many, hang their morals, ethics and standards up with their Globe and Anchor on the way over the side. Murtha has done more than that, I think he has slipped his cable. He is a disgrace to our Corps, I would never call him a “fellow Marine” for he is not.
.
It needs to be done, but the cowards in our system do not have the...guts. Thank YOU for your service!
SOAB!!
As a PA resident I’m going to pay for this blow-hard’s defense???
I like...
LOL to your post but not the situation. Cousin Vinny indeed!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.