[mbraynard]

I really don’t care what Mitt says he’ll do now. He has no credibility on this issue.

Why would he, as governor, veto stem cell research? Can you name a single action he took as governor that betrayed the side of life?

At best, you have him guilty of lying to liberals.

[EternalVigilance]

Can you name a single action he took as governor that betrayed the side of life?

Commonwealth Care, more commonly known as RomneyCare, because it was Mitt's baby, includes taxpayer-funded abortions.

Pretty major item, don't you think?

[EternalVigilance]

Romney still supports the destruction of human embryos for the purposes of scientific experimentation, by the way.

[Route66]

Did you watch the video linked in post 85? Depending on which side Mitt was really on, and we don't really know, he was either lying to his whole state about being pro abortion or he lied to the pro life organization who gave him their endorsement based on his profession to them. The man was caught playing both sides of the fence there.

So was he lying when he took the endorsement or when he adamantly declared he was pro abortion? One way or another there was a lot of lying going on there. Mitt can't have it both ways and it really doesn't matter which side he was actually on when he was lying. If he is shown to be a man who openly lies to the voters about a major policy position, there is just no way he's going to be trusted by the majority of conservatives.

And by the way... On this video Mitt promises he will do nothing during his term to hinder a "woman's right to choose". To my knowledge, that was the truth.