Posted on 11/12/2007 7:28:40 AM PST by Invisigoth
How would you feel about a $9.589 billion tax increase? Wait. It’s a cigarette tax increase.
Oh. Well, you say. That’s different.
That’s what the Democratic majorities in the House and Senate are counting on you to think. Not all Americans are reflexively opposed to tax increases, but among those who are, opposition tends to be far less ferocious when you are convinced you will not be the one paying.
(Excerpt) Read more at northstarwriters.com ...
Plus, it usually affects those the most that can ill afford it.
“The problem with cigarette tax is not that it’s unfair.”
BS. That is THE MAIN problem with it.
It established that there is a less than desirable class who DESERVE to be taxed more than everyone else. What they do is say things like:
“Smoking is horrible. Anyone who smokes is engaging in a disgusting and self-destructive habit. I have little sympathy for the argument that cigarette taxes unfairly target smokers. Smokers unfairly target themselves by smoking. I would say they should just stop doing it, thus avoiding the tax, but they can’t because they’re addicted to nicotine. If they didn’t know that would happen before they started, they have only themselves to blame.”
Screw this guy.
Taxing Nanny State Ping................
To liberals, any tax (on others) is good.
Ditto that.
Ever notice how when liberals (Democrats) in charge don't have the answers to the serious problems facing our country they NEVER fail to pull another tax out of the hat for smokers... or place another ban on smokers.
And, incredibly they pat themselves on the back for a job well done... while everything around them is sh*t stick.
Yup. Where are the cries to 'exempt the poor and middle class?' To make it a "progressive tax" and soak the rich.
Lousy bastard Dem hypocrites.
In regard to the excerpt you posted, I would agree. But the article does give an “additional” argument for why taxing cigarettes is a bad idea.
The young and the uneducated have the highest concentration of smokers.
People are quitting smoking. Maybe we should tax cheeseburgers instead. Tax overeaters the way smokers are taxed. Smokes have gone from $1.35 to $4.25 in the last 10 years.
You are right of course.
“But the article does give an “additional” argument for why taxing cigarettes is a bad idea.”
Indeed, so I’m not sure why the attack on people who smoke was warranted. He agrees the tax is wrong so what is the point of bashing those the tax is aimed at?
No, no. It was Meathead (Rob Reiner) who proposed that tobacco be taxed to fund children's healthcare in California.
I say, when that runs out, tax movie tickets!. Let's see what ol' Robbie thinks of that!
No, no. It was Meathead (Rob Reiner) who proposed that tobacco be taxed to fund children’s healthcare in California.
I say, when that runs out, tax movie tickets!. Let’s see what ol’ Robbie thinks of that!
Excellent idea! Only in America can a meathead like Robbie become a multimillionaire. Also, if they started double taxing lattes he would squeal like a stuck pig.
THIS WOULD BE GREATTTTTTTTTTTT......THIS is a tax I could get behind.....as well as a tax on CURSING in movies and music.
“Indeed, so I’m not sure why the attack on people who smoke was warranted. He agrees the tax is wrong so what is the point of bashing those the tax is aimed at?”
Two reasons:
1. I believe the statement I made. Smoking is stupid. If that offends you, too bad.
2. Rhetorical technique. If I get bogged down trying to defend smoking, I lose the argument, and that’s not the point I really care about anyway. So I concede that point, taking that issue away from the other side, and get to the real issue which is the economic destructiveness of the tax.
Welcome to Free Republic, Danny boy. It’s good to have a newsy come here and exchange ideas ( and body blows, left hooks, etc.). Most of the others who’ve tried didn’t make out so well. Good luck!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.