Huh? What does the 9th Circuit have to do with my post? I cited Parker. Parker cited United States v. Verdugo- Urquidez. That case defined "the people" as a certain class of individuals, which answered your question.
My point, if you forgot, was that "the people" did not mean every person. Why you went off on a tangent of "individual" vs "collective" is beyond me.
And stop the insults. I'll see to it that you get equal time from the mods if I have to go to Jim to do it.
This case originated in the 9th circuit. You'd know that if you weren't such a troll...
My point, if you forgot, was that "the people" did not mean every person.
No. Your point was to try and split the US population into groups. "The People" means all US Citizens within the jurisdiction of the US. As implied in the case above, it does not pertain to Mexican citizens living in Mexico.
However, it also doesn't establish any "collective" Right for anything you pathetic moron. And quite your whining about the "insults". Your very presence here is insult enough you gun grabbing, Constitution hating troll...