Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
United States v. Verdugo- Urquidez,

This case originated in the 9th circuit. You'd know that if you weren't such a troll...

My point, if you forgot, was that "the people" did not mean every person.

No. Your point was to try and split the US population into groups. "The People" means all US Citizens within the jurisdiction of the US. As implied in the case above, it does not pertain to Mexican citizens living in Mexico.

However, it also doesn't establish any "collective" Right for anything you pathetic moron. And quite your whining about the "insults". Your very presence here is insult enough you gun grabbing, Constitution hating troll...

897 posted on 11/15/2007 6:29:31 AM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse
His own words: if they don't/can't vote, then there's no way they are "part of a national community or who have otherwise developed sufficient connection with this country". Ergo, citizens are not necessarily "part of the national community" - an absurdity revealing his flawed axioms. Until he changes his axioms, he can't understand who constitutes "the people".
904 posted on 11/15/2007 6:56:05 AM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 897 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson