Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RamingtonStall; Eaker; humblegunner; thackney; Squantos; Travis McGee; wolfcreek; TheMom; ...

Some would say we vote from the rooftops as well...

They certainly understand they can exercise a policy that would ban and infringe on our inalienable and individual right to keep and bear arms...

But try to implement it is another totally issue and problem...

I’m sure this again will be an other in a long line of irritations to some of us...

We’ll manage to be the fly in the ointment once again...

One of these days someone up there will realize we are not the problem...We are a solution...

One other thing to note...And this is kinda important...

In order to trigger the strict scrutiny test or standard, the Court would have to find that the Second Amendment is a “fundamental right” which it will not do...I don’t believe the individual right camp is even arguing that it is a fundamental right. If the “fundamental right” issue is put before the Court, we loose 6-3...That’s because no gun law - none - would meet the strict scrutiny test and the Court would know such a holding would strike down every gun law in the Country. That they will not do...

The scope of a “good” ruling from the SCOTUS...On this issue will foster litigation on its scope for many years to come...In my view, it’s overly optimistic to believe that the Democratically-controlled Senate is going to approve any “strict constructionist” judges/justices you believe the Democrat-in-Republican-clothing Giuliani is going to appoint...It will never happen...

Also, there is absolutely no support for the contention that a proven liar like Giuliani is going to appoint strict constructionist judges...

Also, don’t be fooled by labels on judges...Unless the President is willing to make covert inquiries as to how a potential judge or SCOTUS...Justice feels specifically about guns, then we know nothing...

Giuliani would never make such an inquiry!!!

Judge Robert H. Bork was clearly the most qualified, most conservative, strict constructionist judge ever nominated for the U.S. Supreme Court...He was ALSO rabidly anti-gun and anti-2A. He would have been a disaster for us...

The folks who think “Giuliani isn’t great, but he’s okay” are going to be as surprised as President Eisenhower when he saw the opinions issued by his conservative choice for the Supreme Court. — William Brennan

Brennan turned out to be the most liberal Justice in modern times...We simply cannot let Giuliani get the Republican nomination.


686 posted on 11/11/2007 5:33:58 AM PST by stevie_d_64 (Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: stevie_d_64

I agree with every bit of that.


694 posted on 11/11/2007 8:00:19 AM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies ]

To: stevie_d_64; Travis McGee; sit-rep; hiredhand

Sure wish I’d not sold all my guns...........:o)

Ulius Louis Amoss had some really good ideas. Do not allow those ideas to be muddied up by the Louis Beam BS versions of the Colonels skills.......

Stay safe !

Vote with your dollars and your time !

Flush Congress 2008 !


718 posted on 11/11/2007 1:31:26 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson