To: Dead Corpse
Well, clearly its militia relevance was deemed critical to the outcome of the case (if ever taken to its conclusion).
Perversely, Leftists don’t realize that their line of reasoning means we can have new M16s.
323 posted on
11/09/2007 12:44:56 PM PST by
ctdonath2
(The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
To: ctdonath2
Leftists dont realize that their line of reasoning means we can have new M16s. Such "reasoning" doesn't apply to leftist thought processes - they always think backwards. "This is the result we want, so the rules for this situation must be X, and the rules for that situation must be Y in order to achieve that result." In other words, they'll use one reason to deny you a freedom, then refute that reason to deny you another one.
328 posted on
11/09/2007 12:50:49 PM PST by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: ctdonath2
If I remember my high school civics correctly, and it has been - just- a few years, the government has duties and powers as enumerated in the Constitution; rights, as outlined in but not limited by the Bill or Rights, pertain to the people/individual citizen. Nowhere in the Constitution do I see the government having the power or duty to confiscate personal weapons. Feel free to correct me if my memory is inaccurate.
332 posted on
11/09/2007 12:54:03 PM PST by
ArmyTeach
(Our soldiers - my heroes)
To: ctdonath2
I have a couple of semi-auto Ar's. While I like the platorm, I'd prefer something along the lines of a select fire LR-308 from DPMS. Based on Eugene Stoner's modular design, it has all the accuracy of a pretty good bolt gun chambered in .308 Win/7.62x51 NATO.
Of course, being able to save up for a Dillon Aero M134-D would be kind of nice too...
337 posted on
11/09/2007 12:59:20 PM PST by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson