That’s clear as mud and takes your usual tactic of asserting the opposite of the truth about me, but it sounds like you’re now admitting that your post 1,363 was completely wrong, and Scalia’s comment posted by me at 1,362 did indeed have something (everything, actually) to do with Miller. Is that correct?
Only if you have mud in your eye.
Read slowly and try to keep up:
Scalia refuted your position that militia membership was a prerequisite to the right to keep and bear arms. He noted that Miller was silent on the question.