Only if you have mud in your eye.
Read slowly and try to keep up:
Scalia refuted your position that militia membership was a prerequisite to the right to keep and bear arms. He noted that Miller was silent on the question.
I guess you’ve forgotten that before Heller was decided, the idea that militia membership was important to firearms rights was your cherished notion, and you insisted on asking everyone on this thread whether Crips and Bloods were in the militia, twice saying the answer had some relevance to their firearms rights. I was mocking that silliness by noting that the Supreme Court had heard a 2A case (Miller) about non-militia members, and was glad to see that Scalia joined me in mocking gungrabbers like yourself with the same argument.