Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
you can take off and land and fly wherever you want without federal control, correct?

I can't. Federal law says I'd have to go see a doctor and get a current medical and then go see a flight instructor for a flight review signoff before I could take a passenger. There are some more rules if I did it at night.

Even in those places, you have to have a federal license. There are federal rules about airplane maintenance. Some ultralights and hang gliders and stuff were exempt, last I knew, but that was pre-9/11. You have to maintain a certain distance from people and their stuff. There are still some rules related to weather. There may still be some unregulated aircraft in unregulated places, but all airplane flying is subject to some federal regulation.

I don't have any problem with the idea of federal aviation regulations. I don't even have a problem with those rules reaching a flight across Florida in a private plane. In some parts of the state, you could even fly from one private airstrip to another and remain in uncontrolled airspace, if you stay low enough. Your flight might go over my house, and I can't stop you, just like I can't stop you going up the navigable river. The feds can make that kind of rule. The feds can also regulate aspects of your flight route, your training, and your plane, for the same reasons they can regulate river traffic, mainly safety.

This is more fun when we disagree, but you'll have to look elsewhere for someone who opposes federal aviation regulations.
1,033 posted on 11/16/2007 6:14:53 PM PST by publiusF27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1030 | View Replies ]


To: publiusF27
"In some parts of the state, you could even fly from one private airstrip to another and remain in uncontrolled airspace, if you stay low enough."

This is what I was referring to. The other stuff, licensing, maintenance, weather (IFR/VFR), I understand.

"This is more fun when we disagree, but you'll have to look elsewhere for someone who opposes federal aviation regulations."

Not at all. It was merely an analogy I've been using to compare to other federal government laws covering activity that has a substantial effect on interstate commerce.

1,036 posted on 11/16/2007 6:46:39 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1033 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson