To: ari-freedom
What part of the concept of federalism are you having trouble comprehending? If I live in a state whose laws I don’t like (and I do), I try to change them. If I can’t and I find the situation intolerable, I can move to another state. But in most cases, and this is one of them, I’d rather the feds pick their noses than pick my state’s laws. It’s why I like Fred.
47 posted on
11/08/2007 3:05:10 AM PST by
samtheman
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: samtheman
but unborn babies can’t move to another state. they’ll just get killed
49 posted on
11/08/2007 3:07:45 AM PST by
ari-freedom
(I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
To: samtheman
There are plenty of laws that should be left to the states. But there are moral issues that are more important than federalism. The sanctity of an unborn human being’s life is one of them. Would you leave slavery up to each state to decide?
54 posted on
11/08/2007 3:15:11 AM PST by
FreePoster
(Duncan Hunter in 2008)
To: samtheman
"What part of the concept of federalism are you having trouble comprehending?"
the part where were allowing states to step on immutable, defined, constitutional rights which are *specifically* documented to prevent the abrogation of said rights to the states.
239 posted on
11/08/2007 10:26:57 AM PST by
N3WBI3
(Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson