I’m especially disappointed in Brownback. Does the pro-ILLEGAL immigration issue trump the LIFE issue for Brownback?
The LEAST Robertson could have done was wait until after the primaries.
While I don’t especially care for Pat Robertson, I figured we were on the same page on the life issue.
Pat Robertson joined the chorus in saying that even though Rudy belives in abortion, the only thing that matters is the WOT.
Somebody tell me, can’t a person be pro-life and still be excellent on fighting the WOT?
In fact, Rudy would be the WORST candidate to fight the WOT, because he is so pro-ILLEGAL immigration, and Rudy has no military experience, like Duncan Hunter.
I do hope Rudy is voted out of the primaries.
Huh? He isn't allowed to make his choice before the primary ballots are cast.
You seem to be a control freak in the vein of hillary, IMO.
Yes. Brownback is the big dissapointment for me. I know he and Hunter differ in their immigration policy and their plan for the WOT, as Brownback supports a three state strategy and Hunter doesn’t. However, I always thought that Brownback’s biggest concern was life and the American family. He has sold both those values out to support the socially liberal McCain. McCain is liberal on immigration. I don’t know if he supports the three state strategy plan for the WOT or not, but I don’t recall him saying he does. He supports overturning Roe vs. Wade, but he does not support a Human Life Amendment. He also supports embryonic stem cell research. He doesn’t support a Marriage Amendment either, and I think he supports civil unions.
Pat Robertson says the WOT is important, but he neglects all the other issues. Why not support a candidate good on the WOT and the other issues like Duncan Hunter?