[[Have you brought your assurance that molecules cannot replicate to the attention of Dr. Julius Rebek, Jr, Dr M Reza Ghadiri, Dr. Guntr KieDrwski, or other of the many scientists who have developed self-replicating molecules or are actively researching in the area? If not, here is your chance]]
Technically, they are ‘self’ replicating- they rely on forces to replicate- forces that their DESIGN are capable of utilizing. Replications are duplicates of their selves, but no, they aren’t ‘self’ replicating. “Self’ replicating implies that they are capable of producing hte energy themselves to replicate themselves. A point must be made here that the energy needed for true macroevolution would be so destructive that it would annihilate any organisms right from the start- The experiments to ‘create’ molecules from chemicals failed miserably in that they had to so isolate the cells from the energy needed to create them in the first place, that it was an unrealistic model of dynamic real world experiences. As well, they had to isolate the wrong left handed amino acids from hte right hand ones because the combining of the two destroyed the ones needed to create viable amino acids capable of existing in highly controlled lab environments. Just a little diddy that not many people are aware of when discussing the ‘amino acids from chemical’ experiments that were carried out for decades.
Interesting. Cells produce their own energy?
"“Self’ replicating implies that they are capable of producing hte energy themselves to replicate themselves.'
No it doesn't. It means that the natural processes of chemistry use available energy and raw materials to grow molecules.
"A point must be made here that the energy needed for true macroevolution would be so destructive that it would annihilate any organisms right from the start"
What the heck do you think macro evolution is?
I would like you to examine a black bear and a raccoon and list all the differences between them, then tell me how much energy it would take to change a raccoon into a bear using small changes over, let's say, 200,000 generations.
How about doing the same for a hippo and a whale.
"As well, they had to isolate the wrong left handed amino acids from hte right hand ones because the combining of the two destroyed the ones needed to create viable amino acids capable of existing in highly controlled lab environments. Just a little diddy that not many people are aware of when discussing the ‘amino acids from chemical’ experiments that were carried out for decades."
Where do you get this nonsense?
Please give me the link to your source for this.
Amino acids have been found in space, on meteorites and have been produced through simple lab experiments, including simulations of space where ice is bathed in ultraviolet light, and in 'concussion' experiments. Amino acids form in all kinds of natural situations.
Your diddy is wrong.