Wow, is this graphic telling or what?
To: Right_Wing_Mole_In_Seattle
I thought John Edwards wouldn’t accept lobbyist money?
Hillary we all know....
2 posted on
10/25/2007 11:20:47 AM PDT by
Rick_Michael
(The Anti-Federalists failed....so will the Anti-Frederalists)
To: Right_Wing_Mole_In_Seattle
One reason I like Duncan Hunter.
Individual contributions
$1,756,366
93%
PAC contributions
$40,273
2%
Candidate self-financing
$50,000
3%
Federal Funds
$0
0%
Other
$44,234
2%
3 posted on
10/25/2007 11:25:50 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: Right_Wing_Mole_In_Seattle
I wonder how many contributed to Tancredo for him to get that much.
4 posted on
10/25/2007 11:29:43 AM PDT by
fireforeffect
(A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
To: Right_Wing_Mole_In_Seattle
the graphic is telling but the money is not overwhelming. I would have expected more to be honest with you.
To: Right_Wing_Mole_In_Seattle
Interesting graph on the lobbyists contribution. Look at the presidential election years, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004. In ‘92 and ‘96, the majority contributions went to RATS and Clinton got in and kept the seat. In 2000 and ‘04, the majority contributions went to the PUBS with the prez getting in and keeping the seat. Makes for interesting observations for 2008.
6 posted on
10/25/2007 11:37:52 AM PDT by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: Right_Wing_Mole_In_Seattle
No comments on Ron Paul’s “big take”?
7 posted on
10/25/2007 11:38:56 AM PDT by
caltrop
To: Right_Wing_Mole_In_Seattle
Pretty interesting..can you fix it up as a Percentage of total received? That would be very telling!
8 posted on
10/25/2007 11:40:54 AM PDT by
jonathanmo
(So many phobes, so little time...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson