$517,525
$314,840
$215,775
$211,575
$206,300
$122,050
$111,810
$72,800
$70,249
$30,900
$21,500
$17,225
$3,664
$250
Posted on 10/25/2007 11:16:41 AM PDT by Right_Wing_Mole_In_Seattle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I thought John Edwards wouldn’t accept lobbyist money?
Hillary we all know....
One reason I like Duncan Hunter.
Individual contributions
$1,756,366
93%
PAC contributions
$40,273
2%
Candidate self-financing
$50,000
3%
Federal Funds
$0
0%
Other
$44,234
2%
the graphic is telling but the money is not overwhelming. I would have expected more to be honest with you.
Interesting graph on the lobbyists contribution. Look at the presidential election years, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004. In ‘92 and ‘96, the majority contributions went to RATS and Clinton got in and kept the seat. In 2000 and ‘04, the majority contributions went to the PUBS with the prez getting in and keeping the seat. Makes for interesting observations for 2008.
No comments on Ron Paul’s “big take”?
Pretty interesting..can you fix it up as a Percentage of total received? That would be very telling!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I’m sure he was removed, because his crazy followers were freeping the poll. ;-)
Holy cow! Now that is what I was expecting. Thanks!!!
Not nearly as impressive as Thompson.
Individual contributions: 99%
PAC: 1%
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.