Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putnam Lake man charged with fatally shooting suspected burglar
The Journal News ^ | 10/23/07 | TERENCE CORCORAN AND MICHAEL RISINIT

Posted on 10/23/2007 7:11:34 PM PDT by sdk7x7

Police say a Putnam County homeowner shot and killed a man who he thought was trying to break into his home while his family slept. State police charged Peter Guerriero, of Putnam Lake, with manslaughter Monday in the death of 32-year-old David Schachnow, of Southeast. They say the 42-year-old Guerriero shot Schachnow in front of his house early that morning on a walkway that leads up to the front door and a deck. Schachnow was pronounced dead at 3:58 a.m. at a local hospital. State Police Capt. Keith Corlett says that it does not appear that Guerriero intentionally caused Schachnow's death, "but recklessly did it." Guerriero's attorney refused to comment on the charges.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; crime; guns; rkba
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Curious to hear people's comments on this, particularly those with knowledge of the relevant NY State laws....

More of the story can be found at: http://lohud.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071023/NEWS04/710230371/1023/NEWS07

1 posted on 10/23/2007 7:11:35 PM PDT by sdk7x7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7

I misread the headline as ‘respected burglar’.

What? You shot a pillar of the criminal community, one of the police department’s best customers? What will they do now when they have to round up the usual suspects?


2 posted on 10/23/2007 7:14:35 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7

Obviously, the homeowner doesn’t listen to G. Gordon Liddy. He has said if you find yourself in such a situation, make sure to drag the body in the house before authorities get there.

(Yes, I know the weaknesses with such a maneuver.)


3 posted on 10/23/2007 7:15:38 PM PDT by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7

“shot Schachnow in front of his house early that morning on a walkway that leads up to the front door and a deck”

Ummmm....not familiar with NY laws, but this could very well be a “bad shoot”.


4 posted on 10/23/2007 7:16:57 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Tracking The "Flyin' Imams" since 11/20/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CASchack
I'm not a touch feely guy, but I know that if you screw around with a body after you shoot it...... you're screwed.

A lot of folks don't respect cops and sometimes think they're not very bright, don't bet on it.

5 posted on 10/23/2007 7:18:00 PM PDT by Dick Vomer (liberals suck....... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7

I don’t know anything about NY state laws but I don’t think you can just shoot anyone who is on your property but outside the house. I remember one incident when a friend of mine woke up in the middle of the night and there was a drunk man wandering around his backyard. He just called the police and they hauled him off.


6 posted on 10/23/2007 7:18:45 PM PDT by John123 ("What good fortune for the governments that the people do not think" -- Adolf Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7

I thought the suspect had to be *inside* your home before you could kill them. Shooting them outside your home is illegal. They could just be a neighbor asking for flour, for example.


7 posted on 10/23/2007 7:19:30 PM PDT by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7

What a total POS article.

How about not reporting until you have something to report. Why was the dead man in the guys yard?


8 posted on 10/23/2007 7:20:33 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (No to nitwit jesters with a predisposition of self importance and unqualified political opinions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7

There’s more to this than is being told. No place in the US can you shoot someone for merely trespassing or attempted B&E.


9 posted on 10/23/2007 7:21:20 PM PDT by LouAvul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7

Can’t tell what happened by just reading that story. Hard to imagine what the guy was doing at that hour but there is always the chance that he had an emergency and was trying to get help.

In other words you can’t shoot someone just for being on your property at night unless you have solid evidence he is trying to harm you.


10 posted on 10/23/2007 7:21:52 PM PDT by yarddog (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CASchack

did the G-man really say THAT??? I would have thought he would have been more clued in than to recommend that 1950s SOP bull$hit.


11 posted on 10/23/2007 7:22:51 PM PDT by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7

The shooter is in big trouble!


12 posted on 10/23/2007 7:24:52 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
There’s more to this than is being told. No place in the US can you shoot someone for merely trespassing or attempted B&E.

Correct for trespassing. Incorrect for attempted burglary. Castle Doctrine. You can defend yourself and your property with lethal force. You do not have to retreat. That said, engaging a burglar in a detached garage is a grey area and there are lots of them. If you go armed to investigate and are confronted with an armed perp., good shoot. If you go to investigate and find a drunk digging through your stuff, bad shoot. It's best to defend yourself, your family and your property at your homes interior perimter, WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE (in my opinion). Otherwise, arm yourself, call the police and be ready for anything while watching your stuff get stolen.

13 posted on 10/23/2007 7:26:01 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (No to nitwit jesters with a predisposition of self importance and unqualified political opinions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Texas.


14 posted on 10/23/2007 7:26:30 PM PDT by Eaker (If illegal immigrants were so great for an economy; Mexico would be building a wall to keep them in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
There’s more to this than is being told. No place in the US can you shoot someone for merely trespassing or attempted B&E.

I thought you have to "hail the house" in Texas after dark or you are fair game to be shot.

15 posted on 10/23/2007 7:26:57 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The only good Mullah is a dead Mullah. The only good Mosque is the one that used to be there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts
I thought you have to "hail the house" in Texas after dark or you are fair game to be shot.

Whose Hail? Oh, you mean like, "When the hail are ya gonna let me in?"

16 posted on 10/23/2007 7:28:07 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (No to nitwit jesters with a predisposition of self importance and unqualified political opinions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7

Not enough information.


17 posted on 10/23/2007 7:37:30 PM PDT by sourcery (Referring a "social conservative" to the Ninth Amendment is like showing the Cross to Dracula.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1
"When the hail are ya gonna let me in?"

LOL!

18 posted on 10/23/2007 7:43:28 PM PDT by 2111USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7
Curious to hear people's comments on this,

The biggest comment at this point is there is not enough information to comment knowledgeably.

Diagrams of the home, neighborhood and etc would help immensely.

The nature of the encounter,the circumstances of any verbal or physical exchange between the two men would all make a big difference in the view of the 'autoritees' on whether or not they would investigate and prosecute the homeowner.

Right now from the story it sounds like it was not a "clean shoot" ie man breaking a window glass or door etc.

It does not make it a "bad shoot" just that the 'autoritees' smell vulnerability.

With more details I will cheerfully spout off to the dismay of the gung ho "hang em high" crowd.

Best regards,

19 posted on 10/23/2007 7:44:38 PM PDT by Copernicus (Mary Carpenter Speaks About Gun Control http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=7CCB40F421ED4819)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7
When I was a Peace Officer in NY State, and had to undergo weapons training once a year for qualification, we were taught that if you caught someone IN your house, and if you had a means of leaving that house, then that was the option you needed to take. Even if you feel threatened, if you can leave, you must leave and not use force. If he was armed but hadn't attacked you, you still had a legal requirement to leave that house. If you used deadly physical force on an intruder, and he wasn't armed, you'd be held legally responsible for his death. You could not shoot someone just because they were attempting to gain entry to your house. Again, if you were able to leave the dwelling, that was your legal responsibility.

We were told that if we shot and killed someone entering our homes, or if we caught them walking out the front door with our TV set, jewelry, or life savings, we didn't have the right to shoot them. It was only if he was inside your home, and attacking you or another person with a weapon, that you were legally able to use deadly physical force to stop him.

Years ago I had an acquaintance whose husband used to beat her up. They were separated and she had restraining orders on him, but he'd still show up and get nasty with her. She asked the cops what would happen if she ended up killing him in her home, and the cops told her, that she'd better make sure he was found with a weapon in his hand, or she would be going to jail. Pretty crazy statutes if you ask me. I've been retired for almost four years now, so I have no idea if the laws have changed, but I highly doubt it, especially in light of this guy's being charged with manslaughter for killing a man ON his property.

20 posted on 10/23/2007 7:50:32 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson