Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Badeye
Personally, I think this should have been decided on a state by state basis. Roe v Wade makes that virtually impossible, as we’ve seen.

Do you also think that Hitler's holocaust should have been decided on a province by province basis? When and where did it become the opinion of voters that decides what is eternally right and wrong? IIRC, those standards were written on stone and brought down from Mt Sinai by Moses, not the result of a vote by the Israeli tribe.

The American holocaust has so far taken approximately 50,000,000 innocent human lives compared to Hitler's "mere" 6,000,000 innocent Jews. In your opinion which nation is more worthy of condemnation, the one where the people have the right to vote on the issue, or the one where the ordinary people were virtually prisoners in their own nation and had no effectual say in the matter?

145 posted on 10/23/2007 8:40:03 AM PDT by epow (The cross in the middle should have been mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: epow

Again, I’m not the ‘enemy’ here. I’ve already noted multiple times I don’t support Abortion, and that I find Roe v Wade horrible law.

I’d like to think you actually read what I just repeated, but your post to me ranting about a ‘holocaust’ indicates either you didn’t, or you just want to rail at somebody on this topic.

I’m not the ‘enemy’ on this topic. I’m just noting this is politically great for the GOP base, but a loser in a general election cycle. Same as gun control is politically great for the Dems base, but a loser in a general election cycle.


147 posted on 10/23/2007 8:42:47 AM PDT by Badeye ('Ron Paul joined 88 Democrats.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson