Have you read Mark Fuhrman's book on the subject? If you had, you would know that one of the inescapable FACTS of the case, is that the timeline of events provided by Michael Schiavo for the night of Terri's *accident* is at odds with the timelines provided by her family, neighbors, EMS, police and ER personnel.
"This is a case of a husbands ability to make a legal decision that has been entrusted to him by his wife and the laws of the state."
There is strong circumstantial evidence that suggests Michael Schiavo tried to kill Terri. Being unsuccesful in his endeavor to do it himself. Suppose for just one second this is true, and consider your arguments on his behalf in this context.
I'd offer a slightly different suggestion: Suppose that a Mr. Shyster had a wife he wanted to get rid of, and he was familiar with Messrs Felos, Greer, et al. With the state of the laws and enforcement as they are, what reason is there to believe he wouldn't be able to incapacitate his wife the way Terri was, and then have her killed in similar fashion?
No matter how pure Mr. Schiavo might be (yes, I know both you and I would smirk at that last bit) there certainly are men in the world who would want to kill their wives if they thought they could get away with it. The government should protect women against such people, but I see no reason to believe it would protect against a husband who schemed as described above.
Why don't people get that major fraud occurred in Terri's case?
They never will. Although the media did a great job brainwashing the American people, thank God they didn't have much of an effect on freepers.