Posted on 10/20/2007 2:08:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
"I speak for at least half the people here, including the Founder Jim Robinson, who has stated he will not vote for Giuliani under any circumstance."
Agree.
Don't Cut and Run, vote pro-life every time. It's the way you always win.
‘We cannot diminish the value of one category of human life — the unborn — without diminishing the value of all human life.’ —Ronald Reagan
Not Dem, liberal. When pro-abortion liberal faces pro-abortion liberal, unborn children lose, and the party affiliation does not matter.
“Yes, I would rather see a pro-abortion Democrat win over a pro-abortion Republican.
Now hit the abuse button and report me to the Mods.”
Buzz off.
Snappy comeback! Not bad, not bad....
I'm sure some would disagree, just out of spite. ;)
I've asked you before, where is your evidence this will happen. None of your "its just common sense" nonsense you pull from who knows where, but actual facts. Show me one expert in the field or analyst or somebody that actually agrees with your assertion.
Not you, as you would rather let a Dem win knowing it will mean the deaths of countless unborn children while that Dem is in office. Sleep tight.
***Jim Rob, this is baloney. The previous rootytoots like nopardons were summarily ousted for this kind of stuff. Where does the line get drawn?
or in other words “I helped kill a million babies but hey I got a tax cut!”
Not you, as you would rather let a Dem win knowing it will mean the deaths of countless unborn children while that Dem is in office. Sleep tight.
***Jim Rob, this is baloney. The previous rootytoots like nopardons were summarily ousted for this kind of stuff. Where does the line get drawn?
~~~
BUMP DAT !!!...
That is probably because you can't explain it. The constitution does not give the president any powers in this area. The courts have ruled that abortion is an domain that is beyond the reach of the federal government. The popular interpretation is that it is a "privacy" issue, but what the ruling really said is that the federal government has no rights to get involved in it. The only thing a president can do is to appoint judges who will strictly interpret the constitution. What this effectively means is that abortion will become a states issue.
What you appear to be telling us is that you are OK with a POTUS that would appoint judges who would legislate from the bench if it supported your personal agenda. Is this right? Rudy has already pledged many times that he will only appoint strict constructionist judges leaving the abortion issue to what is written and not written into the constitution.
“The previous rootytoots like nopardons were summarily ousted for this kind of stuff. Where does the line get drawn?”
You’re a bully, aren’t you. Can’t fight your own fights, so you enlist the mods to come to your aid. A complete bully. Are you proud of yourself? Maybe it is you and your comments that ought to be reviewed. I am stating the truth, that under a Dem Admin more babies will remain unborn. Refute it with facts, not bullying, if you are capable of it. In fact, forget it. I don’t like bullies and our conversation is over, because it is impossible to have a discussion with someone who has a single point of view and no others allowed but your own. Good nite and don’t reply to me in the future as I will not reply to you. Bullies are not the kind of people I want to have to deal with in life.
Good nite and don’t reply to me in the future as I will not reply to you.
***Good luck with that thin skin of yours.
“Do not post to me”
Free Republic ^ | 8/28/07 | Admin Moderator
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1888013/posts
Posted on 08/28/2007 5:47:37 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
I am pro life and pray this abomination ends and ends soon. However, if Rudy is the choice and I pray this is not our choice, but what if it is, then what?
a) stay at home and not vote?
b) vote Democratic?
c) leave the USA?
d) write one in (which never counts)?
We as a people could put a lot of pressure on him if he is the nomination.
All I know is that MS. Clinton cannot win the election! Not this time not ever!
BUMP!!!
if Hillary wins, she will lose after 4 years of failed policies. If Rudy wins, he will be the default nominee for the next election. That’s 8 years of pro-abortion and the GOP will no longer be known as the pro-life party in the future.
BUMP!!!!!!! ;)
About two years from now, if Hillary wins because you anti-Rudy people didn’t vote, then hop back on a thread similar to this one and explain yourself. And after Hitlery has been in office for 4-8 years, let’s check out the before and after statistics on the abortion rates under her regime. Explain that too.
-
We’re not going to vote for hillary. Those that vote for her will be accountable for the abortions under her watch. Those that vote for rudy will be accountable for the abortions under his watch.
Evidently, during the entirety of the nearly two full centuries spanning the gulf between 1776 and 1973, the United Staes was NOT, contrary to popular belief, a part of "the real world."
Fancy that.
In all the time I've been posting here, few FReepers have proven themselves either as rigorous or (ultimately) as genuinely persiasive in their support of an intellectually sustainable pro-life position as has wagglebee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
