Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EveningStar
The debates without those four men were more engaging and substantive.
23 posted on 10/19/2007 4:15:59 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture (Hunter / Keyes '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: CounterCounterCulture

All the FL GOP wants Giuliani anyway, even though most of the voters don’t.


26 posted on 10/19/2007 4:19:35 PM PDT by darkangel82 (All right! Let's go Tribe!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: CounterCounterCulture

>>> The debate should include Giuliani, Thompson, Romney, McCain

>> The debates without those four men were more engaging and substantive.

I am sure BOTH viewers would agree.

Why would anyone watch a debate between a half-dozen candidates with a cumulative 9% support among GOP voters?

It might be more engaging because it felt like the candidates were talking directly to you ... but that might be due to the fact that the candidates are talking ONLY to you.

Personally, I don’t care much for meaningless political posturing. The top 5 candidates are the only ones with meaningful answers anymore ... none of the others are having any effect whatsoever, and they’re generally wasting my time.

H


33 posted on 10/19/2007 4:41:08 PM PDT by SnakeDoctor (How 'Bout Them Cowboys!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson