Replies

>>> The debate should include Giuliani, Thompson, Romney, McCain

>> The debates without those four men were more engaging and substantive.

I am sure BOTH viewers would agree.

Why would anyone watch a debate between a half-dozen candidates with a cumulative 9% support among GOP voters?

It might be more engaging because it felt like the candidates were talking directly to you ... but that might be due to the fact that the candidates are talking ONLY to you.

Personally, I don’t care much for meaningless political posturing. The top 5 candidates are the only ones with meaningful answers anymore ... none of the others are having any effect whatsoever, and they’re generally wasting my time.

It might be more engaging because it felt like the candidates were talking directly to you ... but that might be due to the fact that the candidates are talking ONLY to you.

No, talking about constitutional rights, principles, and liberties is engaging to me. I understand the ignorant masses may not be as engaged, and that is there problem, which of course their ignorance affects us all by how they vote.

Watch me yawn as the so-called top tier try to explain their flip-flops for the umteenth time. They are the ones wasting my time.