What’s the point of this again? Why not condemn policies in Zimbabwe or the Sudan that are killing people TODAY? What’s up with this 100 year-old stuff?
It was merely a ploy to anger Turkey. Get Turkey riled and they'd cut off support for the WOT and our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Maybe even force us to close Incirlik. Then blame Bush for the debacle. Turkey is the shipping and waystation point for lots of supplies and ammo. This was just another way of killing the war in Iraq without any Dems fingerprints on it, but it didn't fly.................
>>? Why not condemn policies in Zimbabwe or the Sudan that are killing people TODAY?<<
Or how about condemning that mega-commie Pol Pot’s slaughter of millions of Cambodians in the mid-1970s?
Oh, wait...can’t do that...the Democratic Party made it all possible. Maybe that’s why Pol Pot changed the name of the country to “Democratic Kampuchea” — as a token of gratitude to his favorite American political party.
The point is that if this resolution is passed, it would ADVERSELY affect our war effort in Iraq and Afghanistan. Moreover, I believe the real reason is to play "defense" and shield Iran in case the President wants to bomb them, which I hope he will before leaving office.
Condemning Zimbabwe or Sudan won't have any ADVERSE effect on the USA.
That's how our beloved traitor RATs operate.
Exactly! Who thought this up anyway??? Who cares at this point?