Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: traviskicks
This sentence was more than all the other GOP candidates put together said in substance against the Unions.

Let's look at what Paul said again.
Mr. Paul: The right to unionize should be a basic right of any group. Mr. Paul: You should be able to organize. You should have no privileges, no special benefits legislated to benefit the unions, but you should never deny any working group to organize and negotiate for the best set of standards of working conditions.

Now let's look at what some of the others said.

McCain.
I think the key to unions is that any American has the right and privilege to join a union, but should never be forced to do so. And this latest ploy of the Democrats, of signing people up in the most willy-nilly fashion is something that needs to be rejected, because it will not protect the rights of workers who do not wish to join a union.

Romney
...With regards to unions overall, there are some good ones and some not so good. The good ones are those that say how can we do a better and better job helping our members have better and better skills and making sure that the enterprises they work in are more and more productive?...Mr. Romney: But there are bad unions as well, which go too far and who forget that in order for them to be successful the enterprise that they're involved with as to also be successful.

Thompson
Now, I believe in the right that if workers ban together for their own purposes, no questions about that. I do not believe a person ought to have to be a member of the union to work. I do not believe that union bosses ought to use union dues for political purposes that their members don't necessarily agree with. And I do not agree with them denying union members a secret ballot. But other than that, I think that they've done a lot of good over the years for this country and will continue to do so.

Brownback
I think there can be abuses, and I think you're seeing some of them taking place. Department of Labor is going through and looking at some of those abuses, and I think the government has to work aggressively to see that those don't take place and that there is effective oversight, which I don't think you see during a Democrat administration.

Tancredo
That is really one of the problems: that we do allow civil servants to also have union benefits. And, believe me, that becomes a conflict....The creative conflict that occurs between unions and management is usually a good thing. When unions, I think, get off track is when they start to influence public policy, especially with regard to, need I say it, illegal immigration..... allowing illegal immigration into the country because they want to fill up their ranks.

2,180 posted on 10/10/2007 8:36:22 AM PDT by mnehring ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!"- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2179 | View Replies ]


To: mnehrling

yea, all the others are in favor of ‘right to work’ stuff and and increased scruntity, but to ‘reapeal all special benefits legislated to benefit unions’ is absolutely radical. I’ve forgotten the specifics, but there are TONS of laws on the books that basically allow parasitic unions to take over entire industries and do it legally and all sorts of other provisions stuck here and there and everywhere in the law benefiting them.


2,181 posted on 10/10/2007 8:42:49 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson