Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: N3WBI3
Yup us pathetic 100%’s who wont give up on Life, the 2nd amendment, and the size of government just so we can put an R in office...

Romney's platform is pro-life and he acted accordingly as governor. Romney on guns... not nearly the straw man you present. Romney promises to veto 'annual appropriations (with the exception of defense) that grow spending at a rate greater than inflation minus one percent (CPI-1%)'. Romney is a rock-solid fiscal conservative and campaigning as a social & fiscal conservative.

You're no 100%er, you're a 150%er who wants purity retroactively. Bush campaigned as a born-again social conservative...how do you think he was living life before he was 'born-again'? Meanwhile, Romney's past includes incredibly successful business ventures, clean living, marriage to one woman, an incredible family, and you won't cut him any slack.

Thompson is not my first pick (its probably Huckabee) but I sure would be able to pull the lever for him in the general. But as for Willard, Trudy, and McLame ill either sit home or vote third party..

Fine. You'll get what you deserve...Hillary and socialism.

63 posted on 10/09/2007 12:31:16 PM PDT by Swordfished
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Swordfished
Romney's platform is pro-life and he acted accordingly as governor.

"When he ran for governor in 2002, Romney pledged not to change the state's abortion laws, despite his personal opposition."

I'm sorry but mitts personal objections mean nothing to me, his lack of action spoke loudly enough.

"Endorsed legalization of RU-486, the abortion-inducing drug."

""However, as governor of the commonwealth, I will protect a woman's right to choose under the laws of the country and the commonwealth. That's the same position I've had for many years.""

The only thing more despicable then someone who thinks abortion is ok is someone who 'does not' but does not have the backbone to be adamant about it.

On Guns: I notice pretty much every post on your profile is after 2004 when mitt started evolving so he could run for the white house. Pre 2004 he supported the brady bill and bragged about how 'he does not line up with those people (nra)'

Romney is a rock-solid fiscal conservative and campaigning as a social & fiscal conservative.

(1) Even if his pedigree was that good it does not unequal his how do you like me lately platform on social issues. (2) You call backing state provided health care *conservative*

150%er who wants purity retroactively.

LOL If mitt had started his evolution into a social conservative sometime *before* he last had to stand for office in MA I would seriously consider voting for him because I like some of what he has to say... Too bad it waited until he set his sights on the oval office before he started giving a dang about the unborn or our second amendment rights.

Fine. You'll get what you deserve...Hillary and socialism.

Nominate someone who spent the last election cycle to the left and wonder why social conservatives don't vote for ya..

80 posted on 10/09/2007 12:48:51 PM PDT by N3WBI3 (Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson