Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The "Not So Poor" 12 Year Old Who Rebutted Bush on SCHIP Veto
Multiple, Baltimore Sun ^ | 10-07-07 | self

Posted on 10/06/2007 10:42:57 PM PDT by icwhatudo

Graeme Frost, who gave the democrat rebuttal to George Bush’s reasons for vetoing the SCHIP Bill, is a middle school student at the exclusive$20,000 per year Park School in Baltimore, MD.

Graeme was in a severe car accident three years ago, and received care paid for by the government program known as SCHIP-(State Children's Health Insurance Program)

"I was in a coma for a week and couldn't eat or stand up or even talk. My sister was even worse," Graeme wrote. "My parents work really hard and always make sure my sister and I have everything we need, but we can't afford private health insurance."

His sister Gemma, also severely injured in the accident, attended the same school prior to the accident meaning the family was able to come up with nearly $40,000 per year for tuition for these 2 grade schoolers. Confirmation both attended Park found here using edit-"find on this page"-Gemma. It will take you to an article in the schools newspaper about a fundraiser for Gemma class of 16, and Graeme class of 13.

Here are photos of the school's 44,000 square foot Wyman Arts Center: two galleries, an outdoor ampitheater, Meyerhoff Theater, Macks-Fidler Black Box Theater, practice rooms, rehearsal space, and ceramics, 3-D sculpture, woodworking, jewelry, painting, photography, digital graphics studios, recording studio, and keyboard lab.

In a Baltimore Sun article the family claims to be raising their four children on combined income of about $45,000 a year. "Bonnie Frost works for a medical publishing firm; her husband, Halsey, is a woodworker. They are raising their four children on combined income of about $45,000 a year. Neither gets health insurance through work."

What the article does not mention is that Halsey Frost has owned his own company "Frostworks",since this marriage announcement in the NY Times in 1992 so he chooses to not give himself insurance. He also employed his wife as "bookkeeper and operations management" prior to her recent 2007 hire at the "medical publishing firm". As her employer, he apparently denied her health insurance as well.

His company, Frostworks, is located at 3701 E BALTIMORE ST. A building that was purchased for $160,000 in 1999. The buildings owner is listed as DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIAL DESIGN CENTER, LLC whose mailing address is listed as 104 S Collington Ave which is the Frost's home. The commercial property he owns is also listed as the business address for another company called Reillys Designs which leads to the question of whether rental income is included in the above mentioned salary total

The current market value of their improved 3,040 SF home at 104 S Collington Ave is unknown but 113 S COLLINGTON AVE, also an end unit, sold for $485,000 this past March and it was only 2,060 SF. A photo taken in the family's kitchen shows what appears to be a recent remodeling job with granite counter tops and glass front cabinets

One has to wonder that if time and money can be found to remodel a home, send kids to exclusive private schools, purchase commercial property and run your own business... maybe money can be found for other things...maybe Dad should drop his woodworking hobby and get a real job that offers health insurance rather than making people like me (also with 4 kids in a 600sf smaller house and tuition $16,000 less per kid and no commercial property ownership) pay for it in my taxes.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; US: Maryland; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: democratparty; democrats; graemefrost; hillarycare; icwhatudo; kosiswatchingus; koskids; koskomrades; kossacks; lyingliars; nancypelosi; pajamahadeen; phoneypoorkids; phoneypoorpeople; phonyvictim; posterchild; propaganda; schip; schipoffools; scoundrels; sinkingschip; socialism; socializedmedicine; starkravingsocialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 401-408 next last
To: sierranighttide

Who banned “MDI Inhalers”, so that you have to use new ones? Explain a little better, for those of us who do not know all the latest info about asthmatics.


281 posted on 10/08/2007 1:23:38 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Rastus
We need a 25-year-old "child" to hold up that sign.

-PJ

282 posted on 10/08/2007 1:24:06 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

What’s really scary is that no claim is ever denied by the insurance companies that provide the SCHIP program. I wonder which Republican-run companies lobbied for this increase.


283 posted on 10/08/2007 1:30:03 PM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Anyone hear who was driving the car at the time of the accident, and if the driver of was/was not insured?

Great question!

Every article I've seen studiously avoids mention of a driver (or of the driver's car insurance). They're all worded something like this:

"Graeme and his 9-year-old sister, Gemma, were passengers in the family SUV in December 2004 when it hit a patch of black ice and slammed into a tree."

Seems to have been another case of an SUV driving itself.

284 posted on 10/08/2007 1:35:42 PM PDT by shhrubbery! (Max Boot: Joe Wilson has sold more whoppers than Burger King)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: gracesdad
Do your children have brain injuries?

Not sure what your point is. If we were in a serious car accident, our insurance would cover 80% of it,beginning at the 5K mark. That would hurt us financially, but we'd manage. Providing our own health coverage is something we consider to be OUR responsibility, not that of the government.

It sounds like this particular family has never had health insurance, before OR after the accident. Sorry, but if you have kids, you owe it to them to have both life insurance and whatever health insurance you can afford. The mom in the story should look for a job with group insurance coverage. That's what an awful lot of families have to do if there are serious pre-existing conditions that would disqualify them from private insurance.
285 posted on 10/08/2007 1:35:48 PM PDT by ChocChipCookie (Homeschool like your kids' lives depend on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: shhrubbery!

The passive voice is the voice of a liar 90% of the time.

“Mistakes were made.”


286 posted on 10/08/2007 1:49:34 PM PDT by GadareneDemoniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

I haven’t posted here in years (no particular reason) and am a rabid non-partisan lover of simple truth. I don’t know if I hit the right reply button.

I think this is good work that you did and want to commend you. I found this story via atrios via whiskeyfire (liberal blogs) and made a few - I thought - polite, reasonable comments on Whiskeyfire (I’m Karen) and then wanted to reply to M_McLuhan and got a message that I wasn’t allowed to post comments. Thats terrible. They don’t want honest debate or discussion.

http://whiskeyfire.typepad.com/whiskey_fire/2007/10/next-time-you-g.html#comments

It seems so likely that this family is being subsidized by wealthy parents and may well have the equivalent of a $200,000 pre tax income. Taxpayers should not subsidize them. And even if their income really is $45,000 its not fair to take from other taxpayers rather than for the parents to do what they can to make more money. They are both college grads, after all.


287 posted on 10/08/2007 1:51:02 PM PDT by OneCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
"The SDAT info sez their property is valued at 263,000. That’s not money in-hand, but given the info you posted about the end-of-unit recent sale...
Makes you wonder...

No bank in their right mind would give a mortgage (which is $1200/mo they claim) for around $200,000 to people with a "combined" income of $45,000 and 4 kids to support. Obviously, the bank was given much different information and list of assets for them to secure a mortgage loan of that size.

288 posted on 10/08/2007 2:15:21 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

In this case, your screen name is very appropriate. Excellent work!


289 posted on 10/08/2007 2:20:48 PM PDT by auboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chani

ping for later


290 posted on 10/08/2007 2:21:37 PM PDT by Chani (Happy cows make good cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckles
The Dems had to know this was coming. It’s so stupid I don’t know if I believe it.

The loopy Dems are so delirious and hateful of everything Bush/GOP, they couldn't see a freakin' stampede of buffalo if it was about to run them over.

They blind themselves to truth -

291 posted on 10/08/2007 2:27:56 PM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
(from another thread now that I see this is being watched by KOS).

Let's put this in a way dems can understand.
Children like this can't get help.

Because dems are too busy telling us we need to give money to kids like this.

When you start defining everyone as 'poor' and 'suffering', those who are truly in need hurt the worst because the resources that people may want to go to them are diluted down through all the $40k per year private school, $400k house middle class people the dems now claim are poor.

292 posted on 10/08/2007 2:39:34 PM PDT by mnehring ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!"- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
No bank in their right mind would give a mortgage (which is $1200/mo they claim) for around $200,000 to people with a "combined" income of $45,000 and 4 kids to support. Obviously, the bank was given much different information and list of assets for them to secure a mortgage loan of that size.

Don't know about a mortgage, but it looks to me as if their house on S. Collington house was sold for $55,000 on 11/30/1990 (see public record below). I'm not familiar with Maryland's format, so I'm not sure exactly who the buyer was in that transaction, but it looks to me as if it was the Frosts.

The "not arms length" transfer listed that is dated 9/06/2005 (which would have been after the SUV accident of December, 2004), for $52,500, looks to me like some kind of legal formality, like a transfer between family members.
(But I'm not a real estate expert -- maybe some FReeper realtor or lawyer can figure out what it means):

Maryland Department of Assessment and Taxation
Account Identifier: Ward - 01 Section - 01 Block - 1748 Lot - 017
Owner Information
Owner Name: FROST, F. HALSEY
FROST, BONNIE
Use: RESIDENTIAL
Principal Residence: NO
Mailing Address: 104 S COLLINGTON AVE
BALTIMORE MD 21231-2014
Deed Reference: 1) FMC/ 6744/ 954
2)
Location & Structure Information
Premises Address Legal Description
104 S COLLINGTON AVE 16X123
BALTIMORE 21231-2014
Map Grid Parcel Sub District Subdivision Section Block Lot Assessment Area Plat No:
1 1 1748 17 3 Plat Ref:
Special Tax Areas Town
Ad Valorem
Tax Class
Primary Structure Built Enclosed Area Property Land Area County Use
1936 3,040 SF 11130
Stories Basement Type Exterior
3 YES END UNIT BRICK
Value Information
Base Value Value Phase-in Assessments
As Of
01/01/2006
As Of
07/01/2007
As Of
07/01/2008
Land 40,000 100,000
Improvements: 105,680 163,140
Total: 145,680 263,140 223,986 263,140
Preferential Land: 0 0 0 0
Transfer Information
Seller: FROST, F HALSEY Date: 09/06/2005 Price: $52,500
Type: NOT ARMS-LENGTH Deed1: FMC/ 6744/ 954 Deed2:
Seller: MUTH, THOMAS A Date: 11/30/1990 Price: $55,000
Type: IMPROVED ARMS-LENGTH Deed1: SEB/ 2687/ 545 Deed2:
Seller: Date: Price:
Type: Deed1: Deed2:
Exemption Information
Partial Exempt Assessments Class 07/01/2007 07/01/2008
County 000 0 0
State 000 0 0
Municipal 000 0 0
Tax Exempt: NO Special Tax Recapture:
Exempt Class: * NONE *

293 posted on 10/08/2007 2:48:44 PM PDT by shhrubbery! (Max Boot: Joe Wilson has sold more whoppers than Burger King)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

However, they’ve had their house for 17 years and paid about 160,000 for it, no?

This would mean a much lower mortgage. They could also have put a large down payment on the house, yielding an even lower mortgage.

It is possible to have explanations for their financial situation within the set of facts that we have been given. What chaps my hide is when one of the kids is used as a prop (like he was on Bill Maher’s show) asking why Bush doesn’t want kids to have health care.


294 posted on 10/08/2007 2:51:34 PM PDT by sauropod ("Nobody has time for your priceless prose. Get to the point." - Jim Michaels RIP 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: sauropod; shhrubbery!

I stand corrected. They bought it for $55,000. Good for them.


295 posted on 10/08/2007 2:54:21 PM PDT by sauropod ("Nobody has time for your priceless prose. Get to the point." - Jim Michaels RIP 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
So let’s get this strait.. it seems the value of his house has gone up 200% or more, he owns his own business, he sends his kids to a $20k/year private school and he can’t afford to buy health insurance.

He doesn’t need government assistance, he needs a financial planner.

296 posted on 10/08/2007 2:56:16 PM PDT by mnehring ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!"- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: shhrubbery!

A quick claim deed?


297 posted on 10/08/2007 2:58:01 PM PDT by Sybeck1 (Join me for the Million Minutemen March --- Summer 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
The reporter said "it's possible this or that?" Did the reporter actually find out if the possible was the actual or did she just speculate and leave it at that?

-PJ

298 posted on 10/08/2007 2:59:06 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: shhrubbery!

Does it look like Frost’s father was the one who bought the property from Muth in ‘90? Ergo, the younger Frosts may have been living there as a gift from the elder Frosts and that improvements to the property may have been paid for by the elder Frosts (as they were the owners) and then the property was transferred to the younger Frosts for only $52,500 in 2005.

The elder Frosts could “gift” a lot of money every year to a family of 6. Would that money have to be reported on the SCHIP forms?


299 posted on 10/08/2007 2:59:35 PM PDT by OneCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: sierranighttide

Huh? You signed up today to post that?


300 posted on 10/08/2007 2:59:47 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 401-408 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson