Replies

A person does not violate this section if the person's disorderly conduct was caused by an epileptic seizure.

I don't know where you got your definition of Disorderly Conduct because you did not cite your source. It appears to be nothing more than a list of MANY things that *could* be defined as Disorderly Conduct. The connection that you made to Epileptic Seizures, is mystifying. Furthermore, nothing you posted proves your claim that Craig was charged with "Deviant Behavior". You need to get a grip on yourself!

Here is a definition of Disorderly Conduct taken from Find Law, a universally accepted legal source .. and unlike you, I will provide the link to my source: http://criminal.findlaw.com/crimes/a-z/disorderly_conduct.html

Disorderly Conduct

Almost every state has a disorderly conduct law that makes it a crime to be drunk in public, to "disturb the peace", or to loiter in certain areas. Many types of obnoxious or unruly conduct may fit the definition of disorderly conduct, as such statutes are often used as "catch-all" crimes. Police may use a disorderly conduct charge to keep the peace when a person is behaving in a disruptive manner, but presents no serious public danger.

Note: These definitions are nothing more than lists of possibilites that could lead to a charge of Disorderly Conduct. They do not prove deviant behavior. LOL

3) Engages in offensive, obscene, abusive, boisterous, or noisy conduct or in offensive, obscene, or abusive language tending reasonably to arouse alarm, anger, or resentment in others. http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/bin/getpub.php?type=s&num=609.72&year=2006

Now, if you will go the link you will see that is Minnesota's disorderly conduct statute.

And it includes obscene conduct.

That is what Craig was pleading to.

So, once again, stop denying that Craig was not pleading guilty of deviant behavior-he is.

[(1) Engages in brawling or fighting; or (2) Disturbs an assembly or meeting, not unlawful in its character; or (3) Engages in offensive, obscene, abusive, boisterous, or noisy conduct or in offensive, obscene, or abusive language tending reasonably to arouse alarm, anger, or resentment in others. ]

Lets see now.

Craig wasn't involved in brawling or fighting, he wasn't disturbing an assembly or meeting so 1 and 2 are out.

He wasn't being being offensive, abusive, boisterous, or noisy in either his speech or conduct.

So what could be left?

Oh, obscene!

LOL!

Craig is a self-confessed deviant.

If Craig was asked for what he was found for disorderly conduct he would have to say for engaging in obscene behavior that would have caused resentement or anger in someone else.

So your attempts to defend a sexual deviant have failed.