Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr
Exactly - and if the much-vaunted SA-23 system couldn’t see or shoot it down, what does *that* say?

a. The system sucks.
b. The operators are poorly-trained morons
c. Both of the above.

I vote c, leaning more towards poorly-trained morons.

93 posted on 10/04/2007 11:03:29 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat

I also vote (c) - but more towards “the system sucks” side since it’s supposed to be all sorts of amazing capabilities when set to fully automatic operation.

That said, since the units were so new, there almost *had* to have been some Russian cadre training the Syrian operators on their new hardware. They would almost certainly have been assisting or operating the things in a crunch. The fact that the systems didn’t hit a single craft on the way in or out has to be really disturbing.

My rule of thumb for Russian high tech and the claims made by the Russians about same: Halve the effective range, MTBF, and the other claimed capabilities, double the amount of required maintenance claimed, and you generally have a pretty accurate picture of what they’re trying to sell you.


111 posted on 10/04/2007 11:22:10 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson