Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Badeye; Dog
You describe a battlefield exchange between two of them here. Even if its nukes, its not a ‘World War’ by definition. Reason to be worried as hell? No denying it. But World War? Nope, not even close.

It depends on what happens next, of course. Who does Israel hit, besides Syria? Does Iran then pop in with its own nukes, directed at its various enemies?

And what does, say, Egypt do? Turkey?

I can't imagine that the consequences would be that an exchange between Israel and Syria would result in nothing -- the Israelis would undoubtedly hit other targets as well, if only to pre-empt.

189 posted on 10/04/2007 12:22:57 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb

It depends on what happens next, of course. Who does Israel hit, besides Syria? Does Iran then pop in with its own nukes, directed at its various enemies?

And what does, say, Egypt do? Turkey?

I can’t imagine that the consequences would be that an exchange between Israel and Syria would result in nothing — the Israelis would undoubtedly hit other targets as well, if only to pre-empt.

Everything you state is possible.

That said, I still think the headline about just missing WWIII is ridiculous based on the participants alone.


305 posted on 10/05/2007 6:09:41 AM PDT by Badeye (Free Willie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson