Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Neville72

Third party.


18 posted on 10/04/2007 5:39:33 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (in the halls of Valhalla...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: mad_as_he$$
Third Party
is being discussed
19 posted on 10/04/2007 5:40:57 AM PDT by From One - Many (Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk. I Will Be Voting for Mr. Duncan Hunter, fellow FReepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: mad_as_he$$

“Third party.”

Hogwash. If Dobson were to do that (1)the majority of social conservatives would ignore him and vote for conservative Thompson anyway and (2) Dobson would forever consign himself to being irrelevant.

Since when have “Christians” taken orders from this self-appointed jacka$$. Especially when other Christian leaders(Land et al) have publicly supported Thompson.


35 posted on 10/04/2007 5:50:16 AM PDT by Neville72 (uist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: mad_as_he$$

Have you looked at the Constitution Party?

I wrote the above and then I went to the website and the first sentence involved James Dobson planning a campaign strategy.....so never mind


40 posted on 10/04/2007 5:52:59 AM PDT by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: mad_as_he$$
Third party.

Third party gets you Hillary.

85% friend vs 5% friend. Hmm... Real tough choice there.

192 posted on 10/04/2007 7:20:05 AM PDT by Tatze (I'm in a state of taglinelessness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: mad_as_he$$

Third party.


Can we simply change Dobson’s name to H Ross Dobson or maybe Ralph Dobson?

The moral “Majority” appears to be out to tank the next election, unless Dobson and his ilk get to annoint whomever they believe to be the “Chosen One”.


227 posted on 10/04/2007 8:03:35 AM PDT by BritExPatInFla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: mad_as_he$$

Third parties have only ever split the votes of whatever party they spring from.

The republicans were a third party when they formed and did not win the presidency the first time around. They gained ascendancy over a period of years by actively winning over converts to their side regardless of whether it was a presidential election year or not. They had a hotbutton issue to do that with — slavery. They spent even the off years bringing people into the party by actively pursuing and keeping their key issues in front of the public and selling them. These days 3rd parties only actively do anything in a presidential election year which is too little too late. A third party split from the GOP would be the hildebeeste’s fondest dream.


316 posted on 10/04/2007 10:50:40 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson