not once, repeat not once, since my first post on this thread at 405 have you posted the entirety of what freddie had posted on his campaign site DURING Rushes show yesterday.....
Now, you DID post a bit of what Rush had to say about one point in the cleverly timed freddie release, but I suppose you overlooked that Rush neglected (that means avoided) to mention precisely what I find objectionable in this hastily composed statement that appeared when Rush was on-air in day X (how many days is it now?) of this dem etc attempt at lynching Rush.
And still......after 4 or 5 hrs, now.....you STILL haven’t provided me with a quote or cite from any dem who has said anything resembling freddies gratuitous statement “yet Democrats claim he is not being strong enough”.....and the reason is (as you know perfectly well) no democrat or any of their proxies have ever said it.........but they will, sooner or later, since freddie put it into their playbook.
Let me know if Rush says anything about freddie saying “yet Democrats claim he is not being strong enough”........I doubt if he will, because he is too classy and gracious, and not an ingrate.....and also too savvy to not know it will sooner or later come back to bite freddie, but not in the form of anything Rush will say about that particular clause of freddies support.
One more time.....this is false: “yet Democrats claim he is not being strong enough”.........but it will become useful to the dems and their machine.
Why should I? It was posted in #1 on the thread. If you're too lazy to read the article, then that's not my problem.
I suppose you overlooked that Rush neglected (that means avoided) to mention precisely what I find objectionable
I didn't overlook anything. It's not Limbaugh's job to divine your insane obsession over this. In reality, however, it was Limbaugh who called it a "great question" and a "searing point".