Why should I? It was posted in #1 on the thread. If you're too lazy to read the article, then that's not my problem.
I suppose you overlooked that Rush neglected (that means avoided) to mention precisely what I find objectionable
I didn't overlook anything. It's not Limbaugh's job to divine your insane obsession over this. In reality, however, it was Limbaugh who called it a "great question" and a "searing point".
you repeatedly skip over the falsehood
And still......after 4 or 5 hrs, now.....you STILL haven’t provided me with a quote or cite from any dem who has said anything resembling freddies gratuitous statement “yet Democrats claim he is not being strong enough”.....and the reason is (as you know perfectly well) no democrat or any of their proxies have ever said it.........but they will, sooner or later, since freddie put it into their playbook.
I think our basic difference on this is that I see it as freddie needing Rush; whereas YOU see it as Rush needing freddie.
Boehner (and others) said it straight up and pulled no punch, long before Rush went on the air yesterday....freddie me-too’d, but made a bad choice by adding the extraneous punch-pulling false clause.