[rface]

actually ..... I'd rather see a candidate like Rudy rather than an unkown....totally unelectable candidate.....who gets maybe 1-2% in the polls now like Duncan Hunter - who I personally like - but is so totally unelectable.

Rudy would be fine with me....

Romney would be better.....

maybe Fred would be the best - but, he has a lot of catch-up to do....

It strange that so many FReepers are willing to give Hillary the WhiteHouse, just for spite.....under the pretence that Hillary is no worse........

[SoConPubbie]

"It strange that so many FReepers are willing to give Hillary the WhiteHouse, just for spite.....under the pretence that Hillary is no worse........"

Cast your slurs elsewhere.

Nobody wants for Hillary to win, however, it is more important to not destroy everything that conservatives have fought for by nominating/electing a liberal Republican.

I will not knowingly have a part in destroying the Republican party and all it stands for by voting for a Democrat in a Cheap Republican Suit.

Go peddle your nonsense elsewhere!

[RabidBartender]

"It strange that so many FReepers are willing to give Hillary the WhiteHouse, just for spite..."

There's your mistake. It isn't for spite - those who won't vote for Rudy actually believe they have the conservative movement's best interest at heart. If I vote for Rudy, I am voting for a guy who is anti-gun, pro-choice, pro-illegal, pro-gay agenda, etc.

You may see it as "beating Hillary", but the RNC and other liberal Republicans will see it as acceptance of liberal values, and will continue to push the party leftward. Rudy as president will help move the country leftward, as well - with no chance for repair until 2016.

[MEGoody]

It strange that so many FReepers are willing to give Hillary the WhiteHouse, just for spite

If standing on priciple is 'just for spite' in your view, so be it.